USF

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

Good thing Charlie Strong is a dumbass and gave us good field position late in the half. I guess we will see just how incompetent Denbrock is on this drive.
 
Ok we better make some significant adjustments at half time on offense. I am not opposed to playing Bryant as Ridder has been atrocious. They don’t even look like the same team we have been watching all year.
 
I’m pretty sure Ridder has a torn rotator cuff. He can’t throw the ball over 5 yards.
 
Mcginnjw said:
I’m pretty sure Ridder has a torn rotator cuff. He can’t throw the ball over 5 yards.
Click to expand...

He has no business playing in this game right now. He's either very injured, or completely incapable of throwing the ball. Either way, Bryant should be in the game. Also, Denbrock needs to be replaced in the off-season if we are ever going to win the conference and not get embarrassed in an NY6 bowl game. Memphis will destroy us, and Temple is looking like a L as well if this is the offense we are putting on the field.
 
Robert said:
He has no business playing in this game right now. He's either very injured, or completely incapable of throwing the ball. Either way, Bryant should be in the game. Also, Denbrock needs to be replaced in the off-season if we are ever going to win the conference and not get embarrassed in an NY6 bowl game. Memphis will destroy us, and Temple is looking like a L as well if this is the offense we are putting on the field.
Click to expand...

There is no reason to have a QB in the game is if he can’t throw.
 
Coming back from 10 down on the road against a very good defense is a great achievement. All analysts I heard picked USF to win because of its stout run defense and premier corners. There looked to be limited soft spots to exploit in the matchup between the UC offense and USF defense. Nonetheless after a scoreless first half the UC coaches were able to make adjustments and came out to play a smash mouth up the middle running and ultimately overcome the deficit.
 
Lawrugby said:
Coming back from 10 down on the road against a very good defense is a great achievement. All analysts I heard picked USF to win because of its stout run defense and premier corners. There looked to be limited soft spots to exploit in the matchup between the UC offense and USF defense. Nonetheless after a scoreless first half the UC coaches were able to make adjustments and came out to play a smash mouth up the middle running and ultimately overcome the deficit.
Click to expand...

This team has a lot of heart and a legit defense. Just wish Denbrock could find a way to open up the passing game a bit. Don't get me wrong -- I am very happy with 9-1, which is at least 1 more win than I would have expected at this point going into the season. But I am really concerned about our ability to beat some pretty good teams over the next several weeks with a vanilla playbook and a QB who seems to be too injured to throw the ball with any consistency.
 
Robert said:
This team has a lot of heart and a legit defense. Just wish Denbrock could find a way to open up the passing game a bit. Don't get me wrong -- I am very happy with 9-1, which is at least 1 more win than I would have expected at this point going into the season. But I am really concerned about our ability to beat some pretty good teams over the next several weeks with a vanilla playbook and a QB who seems to be too injured to throw the ball with any consistency.
Click to expand...
Interesting that Ridder beat USF with his feet. We find ways to win. Temple of course will be very tough but with the division title in our grasp, I think we can pull it out. I am not confident about beating Memphis at all but if we just make the championship and then lay it all on the line in that game, I will be super happy. Then we have to worrry about Fick.
 
Robert said:
Good point. We played really well, our offensive coordinator looked brilliant as usual, and our QB looked phenomenal. I can't believe anyone was critical.
Click to expand...
Who said anything like that ? 9-1 is a good thing no matter how you look at it and if anything it shows resilience of the coaching and players to WIN consistently against who's on the schedule. Would you prefer 25 of 30 for 450 yards 4 TDs in a loss ?
 

Similar threads

Q
USF Part II
Replies
3
Views
17K
Queens_NYC
Q
Q
USF
Replies
16
Views
29K
waterhead
W
Q
USF Part II (Senior Night)
Replies
11
Views
18K
Queens_NYC
Q
Q
Tulsa Part II
Replies
14
Views
20K
Bcatfollower
B
Q
AAC Tournament Quarterfinals: Temple
Replies
14
Views
25K
sedziobs
S
Back
Top