'16 Georgetown Transfer PF Paul White

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

C

coachpipe

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
1,335
UCalum08 said:
I would say Epperson, just for the fact we would have more years with him. How many would White have?
Click to expand...
Think Epperson will be a tough land. We have two 5's in the fold and even if we play him at a stretch 4 he will still be behind Clark for a year. he'll also have to contend with Scott who I think will surprise some people. Would love to add him but I think he will be going elsewhere.
 
WAITE HOYT 2 said:
Think Epperson will be a tough land. We have two 5's in the fold and even if we play him at a stretch 4 he will still be behind Clark for a year. he'll also have to contend with Scott who I think will surprise some people. Would love to add him but I think he will be going elsewhere.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't see a problem playing behind Clark for a year. Epperson would need a solid year to adjust to the physicality of high major ball. While I'm optimistic for Scott, im not holding out on bringing a guy like Epperson in just because of Scott's behalf.
 
UCalum08 said:
I wouldn't see a problem playing behind Clark for a year. Epperson would need a solid year to adjust to the physicality of high major ball. While I'm optimistic for Scott, im not holding out on bringing a guy like Epperson in just because of Scott's behalf.
Click to expand...
you may not see a issue sitting behind for a year but he might. Especially if he can walk into major minutes immediately. I'm not implying we wouldn't recruit over the top of Scott. Im saying he may develope into a very good player. Many may disagree but immediate playing time is huge in recruiting. Some want guarantees. Not saying this is the case but playing time will be a factor in my opinion. It's also why I feel it will be tough to land a Williams or McNeill. You have Evans,Moore,JJ,Cumberland,Broome. Backcourt seems crowded.
 
WAITE HOYT 2 said:
you may not see a issue sitting behind for a year but he might. Especially if he can walk into major minutes immediately. I'm not implying we wouldn't recruit over the top of Scott. Im saying he may develope into a very good player. Many may disagree but immediate playing time is huge in recruiting. Some want guarantees. Not saying this is the case but playing time will be a factor in my opinion. It's also why I feel it will be tough to land a Williams or McNeill. You have Evans,Moore,JJ,Cumberland,Broome. Backcourt seems crowded.
Click to expand...

I'd have to believe that Williams or McNeill would have the edge over Jenifer or Moore. Or they'd at least have a big opportunity to earn the minutes, since 2 of the 5 you named will have never played a game at UC at the same time Williams or McNeill would be eligible.
 
jacobkdoyle said:
I'd have to believe that Williams or McNeill would have the edge over Jenifer or Moore. Or they'd at least have a big opportunity to earn the minutes, since 2 of the 5 you named will have never played a game at UC at the same time Williams or McNeill would be eligible.
Click to expand...
I'm certain they would consider it but they may opt for immediate playing time with know obstacles. Suppose a P5 offers and the guy manning their spot is a senior? That certainly wouldn't help our cause would it?
 

Similar threads

K
Rivals Big East Preview
Replies
4
Views
2K
psax889906
P
Back
Top