Dan Hoard on UC Shooting

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

swg

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
7,155
Location
Ohio
At some point, somebody has to make a shot.


The Bearcats were 7-for-30 from 3-point range against Villanova and I'm sure a common complaint after the game was that they shot too many threes. Especially since the Bearcats are only making 29% of their shots from outside the arc this year to rank 325th out of 347 Division I teams.


In this case I respectfully disagree.


There have certainly been games this year where the Bearcats offense was too stagnant, resulting in forced 3-pointers with the shot clock winding down. That was rarely the case on Tuesday night. Villanova doubled-teamed UC's big guys when they caught the ball in the paint and dared the 'Cats to make jump shots. As far as coaching strategy is concerned, that would qualify as a "Duh."


Most of Cincinnati's treys were wide open. Larry Davis - who was recruited as a Field Williams-type shooter - went 0-for-5. Cashmere Wright - who opened Big East play by making 7 of his first 8 treys - went 0-for-3. If they go 2-for-8 (instead of 0-for-8), UC probably wins the game.


It would be great if the Bearcats shot layups on every possession, but if the opposing defense doesn't have to respect the threat of an outside shot, it's difficult to get the ball close to the basket. With the size and athleticism that Cincinnati faces in the Big East, it's tough to finish in the upper echelon with a lousy shooting team.


And that's a big challenge moving forward.


UC has a strong nucleus of returning talent led by Rashad Bishop, Yancy Gates, Ibrahima Thomas, Lance Stephenson, Cashmere Wright, and Jaquon Parker. But who is going to make outside shots?


Larry Davis and Dion Dixon are shooting a combined 32-for-130 (25%) from outside the arc. That number drops to 20% in Big East play. Sean Kilpatrick - who is redshirting this year - is more of a penetrator than a jump shooter. Every perimeter player on the team needs to put in serious time this summer trying to become the best shooter he can possibly be.


If there are shooters available in the late signing period, I suspect that Mick Cronin will be holding a "Help Wanted" sign. Having recruited the likes of Steve Logan, Francisco Garcia, and Taquon Dean in the past, Mick knows the value of having a consistent outside threat.

Cincinnati is not far from turning the corner. That's one of the reasons why this season has been so frustrating. What would UC's record be if the 'Cats were just an average shooting team?

http://www.gobearcats.com/blog/2010/03/deadly-shooting.html
 
Pretty much what I said in the 'Going Forward' thread...alluding to the fact that Mick needs to find a consistent shooter, or face peril. Below is an excerpt.


I hate to say it, but if I were MC, I would seriously take a look at the team, and see who can contribute going forward. I'm big on loyalty, but Mick doesn't have the same luxury some coaches enjoy. Assuming that MC returns as coach next year, which I do think will happen, I have to believe that Thomas will want to see marked improvement in the team's performance.
So what's the answer? I would honestly consider cutting Biggie loose and finding a SG or SF who can flat out shoot (sorry Dickie V). While the signing day is over, I would assume (foolishly I know) that there are options out there to at least consider.
 
One thing that does bother me is that when Mick came here, he said he would bring in guys who could shoot. I had no idea in year five (next year) we'd be having the same problem on offense, behind the arc, and ft's.
 
Even if there was a "shooter" available in the late signing period, we don't have a 'ship open..........unless someone transfers or is forced out.
 
Exactly....the outside shooting killlllllllled us last night. If we shoot our avg of 29% we win the game haha. That is actually a pathetic avg from beyond the arc and even more pathetic we shot under that last night.

Mick in the post game said they only had 1 bad three. I'm kind of torn on that statement. While they were open looks, I'm not sure if I like the people who are shooting them. This falls mostly on Bishop. I'm not a fan of his outside game. He is a GREAT roleplayer who doesn't understand his role.

For a team that struggles from outside there is no way we should be shooting it 30 times from beyond the arc. Nova is a great perimeter team and they only shot it 21 times. I would like the number of 3's shot to go way down. This is not our M.O. and is not how we are gonna be successful. We are an athletic/strong team....not a perimeter oriented team.
 
I'm just glad Dan reads BCT and gets ideas for his awesome blogging. :D
 
I'm kind of torn on that statement. While they were open looks, I'm not sure if I like the people who are shooting them. This falls mostly on Bishop. I'm not a fan of his outside game. He is a GREAT roleplayer who doesn't understand his role.

Disagree. Rashad understands the game better than any player we have.
 
Bishop is our most consistent player. I'd rather have him take open threes than Cash, Dixon, or Wright.
 
Will disagree....I think Bishop is a great player when he plays to his strenghts. He was fundamental to our comeback last night. Very aggressive on the offensive glass and on the ball defense is great.

But....

I dont think he's a smart bball player. I think his overall judgement is suspect at best. He is turnover prone, poor shot selection, and struggles to throw the ball in. He may be our most consistent player but I think if he played to his strengths more he could be an even better player.

I guess my overall thoughts on this team's outside game is that I would like to see less of it. Unfortunately statstics dont lie and when you shoot 29% from beyond the arc, we are not gonna win if we continue to shoot more than 20 times from three.
 
I think Bishop is a glue guy. The kind that never gets the credit he deserves. He is a capable scorer who in my opinion has really improved. He is typically asked to guard the other teams best perimeter player.
 
I think Bishop is a glue guy. The kind that never gets the credit he deserves. He is a capable scorer who in my opinion has really improved. He is typically asked to guard the other teams best perimeter player.

On this team, he is certainly the glue guy. For his size and ability, it's amazing how well he does inside..scoring and rebounding-wise. His effort and output is generally consistent. I hope next year he embraces the leadership role this team desperately needs.
 
On this team, he is certainly the glue guy. For his size and ability, it's amazing how well he does inside..scoring and rebounding-wise. His effort and output is generally consistent. I hope next year he embraces the leadership role this team desperately needs.

He is one of the few I can see legitimately being a leader next year.
 
Back
Top