Ralph, not trying to start another urination contest but I disagree that the realignment is ALL about fball. Did the ACC get Pitt and Cuse for their fball programs? Because they have been to so many BCS bowls recently? Did Maryland and Rutgers go to the B1G because of their great Fball records in the past years or their facilities? No, it is all about tv markets at this time. Conferences are worried about how many viewers it can attract in a specefic market and how big their conference footprint can be. Rutgers has done virtually nothing in fb or bb in the past decade, but the NY/NJ viewing area is worth more to them. Now the BTN will have to be aired in those areas. There are also grads from OSU and Michigan that will watch games in NY/NJ and Maryland/DC. Sure the Fball programs are driving the bus and the hire of the head fball coach is the most important hire a university can make but it is more about tv markets than anything else.
This was all started by the BCS announcing that the top 4 conferences would have the greatest chance to get $$$ in bowl games. The remaining conferences are to fight it out for the top remaining spot. If you think about it, being in the BEast right now, we have a better shot at a BCS game than teams like UK, IU, Northwestern, WVU, Rutgers, Maryland under the new system. They take the highest ranking left over team and over the past 6 years UC would have gone to at least 2 BCS games under new format. So that begs the question. Are we better off being a middle of road team w/ no chance at BCS in B12/B1G (we can compete in ACC) or are we better off in some sort of restructured BEast if it indeed can happen? Just don't see BSU/SDSU/UH going to MWC, they would get less money in deal there than w/ Beast. I think B1G and ACC are best fit but B1G will never let us in.
This whole thing is so maddening and I hate it. It has ruined rivalries, but greed knows no boundaries.