Search results

Is one of their starters out due to suspension? And if so, was he out against Depaul? I really wish they wouldn't have lost to Depaul. It could mean they're reeling, but it could serve as a wake-up too. I believe heading into that game they were 13-2 at home, so the likelyhood for them going...

What an asshole. PS You don't speak for everybody, nor the school. And if anyone is the joke, it's you for telling someone else what to do with their time.

The person I quoted has ripped our fanbase before, and seems to be doing it subtly in that very post. I'm of the belief that describing someone as fickle enough to applaud a performance (14 and 9???) with a standing ovation, after everything that has transpired, is indeed a dig at their...

Not anybody in my section, or the droves of UC fans I've known throughout the years. The friends, coworkers, etc all know this guy has been dogging it off and on for years. I'm pretty sure not even 25 and 12 would get it done, in soliciting that type of response. And I'm sure as hell know 14...

I think you could honestly make a case that had Tubby Smith recruited Chris Lofton he'd still be at UK.

Kenyon, Darnell Burton, Fortson, Logan, Hicks, Pete Mickael, Immanual McElroy, Field Williams, Durden, Levett, D'Juan Baker, Max, Damon Flint (I'm on one of the few) Vaughn, Nicky, Blount, Terry Nelson (A must), Brad Jackson, Connor Barwin, Could go on for quite a while, I love just about all...

Don't care.

If we do not make the tourney this year Mick Cronin will be on the top of every single Hot Seat list you see, I guarantee it. If we miss out, attendance will continue to decline, and the only thing that will save him is at MINIMUM a tourney appearance. And that may not even be enough, without a...

Oh my God, my worst fears are coming true. WE'RE TURNING INTO X!!!:mad: I will never define my season's success by that. It would make me no better than all the douchers that celebrated a win vs UC like it was the NC. (Only rivaled by their excitement when Lillith Fair rolled into town) I'll...

Nice find! Btw, wasn't DJuan Wagner the kid whose dad Calipari hired on to get him to sign? I wanna say Cal even kept him on the staff for a year or two after his kid left.

And that's why Mike Thomas needs to be fired as well. I'd say probably about half our fanbase knew what he didn't have the foresight to. For an AD to truly think the odds of this year going well enough to improve a worsening situation after last year was rather stupid. Myself, and just about...

Oh man, I totally forgot about that. If I remember right, didn't he rock cornrows for a good part of the season, and then out of nowhere he had that awesome fro one night? God, it was glorious. "Standing at 6 foot, and 6 foot 9 with the afro, Fletch."

It's an unofficial stat, but Jihad Muhammed holds the school record in both 30+ foot attempts, and makes. That's nothing to sneeze at.

Bolded part: You listen to much Lance, Alum. (I could hear his voice when I read that) I know, b/c that's where you got your (paraphrasing) You can rally behind or dig in against them" sig. I don't think anyone is guaranteeing he's gone this year. I know I'm not. That would be foolish...

1st point, No he hasn't. The only constant is the BE record. And last year we had a worse winning percentage. If there was any improvement, and you're reaching, it was minimal. This year, well if anyone thinks we'll have improved without a winning BE record, but only b/c of the OOC record...

If Yancy goes, Mick is finished. (This year or next, I don't know) There is no way this team has the ability to compete next year at the level it will take to save his job, without Gates. I'm sorry, but that's the truth. I don't know what you do with the kid. I guess I'd try the Bishop...

I don't disagree, but have you ever given any thought to just how bad we'll be if Gates doesn't play next year? Seriously. Quick, who are you giving the 80 minutes of post play to? Even if Jackson gets 30 (I like Jackson, but that's even a lot to expect of him as a Soph) that still leaves...

They also were in the position to lose with those 57 pts. Why look at it so one sided? And even still, being in a position to win, and winning, are entirely two different things. And if you need to count on a guy missing a front end of a 1-1 to win ball games, you're going down one helluva...

Fwiw, here it is: To quote you, the logic is lame. We lost. Like or not, losing ultimately always falls on the head coach. Quit making excuses with the free throws. "Shit happens. it's part of the game." This team laid a big old egg at home. And that falls squarely on Mick's shoulders...

This is so hypocritical for you to use. It was just a week or two ago that someone (NTS??) made mention that if St. Johns had made more FT's that they would have won, and were lucky they shot so poorly. You took extreme exception to it, and replied that it was total bs for them to even bring...