justinhub2003
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,583
I don't know. Last year and the previous few years we had a PG who was kind of flat footed and not as quick. Cronin said pressing was not a great plan with Troy in the game and I imagine (for the same reason) neither was pushing the ball up the court. Troy was flat footed, although sure footed and controlled, but he wasn't built for the press or running.
We have to play to our strengths and I don't see how playing fast is not to our strength this year with 5 scorers on the court and a very quick PG (or two).
There will never be a time when playing fast on offense means that Cronin will relieve his team from getting back on D. A faster pace on O will mean a few more points given up on D by rule...but the efficiency needs to be there on either end to accommodate.
Sure. I guess I just wonder what the expense vs gain is in a pressing defense. You know the expenses are: Potentially getting beat and giving up easy baskets on the other end, and also tiring out your players for offensive possessions. But your gain is maybe driving up turnovers. But is pressing 30 possessions worth the 3-5 additional TO it may create?
If we compare UC's Defense to West Virginia's; basically WVU did one thing better than us: Force TO"s
Our FG% D was 3 points better than WVU, They allowed a dreadful amount of offensive rebounds, Our 2pt% D was 4 points better and we defended the 3 point shot better.
We also ranked 16th in the country in fouls per game whereas WVu ranked 298.
There is some serious downsides to a full on pressing defense. It takes away our biggest strengths in a lot of ways