jacobkdoyle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 17,008
Game is Tuesday at 7 PM at BB&T and on ESPN2.
just get here fast. thats all i ask.
See no issue with that if he is playing well and Cumberland continues to struggle.Waite you have mentioned Broome playing off the ball. I have no problem with that. But he can play 36+ minutes against good teams. He can spend a good chunk of time handling the ball, or not. He just needs to be on the floor and he needs to have the ball a lot.
How about this. Lets start playing good basketball that our team is more then capable of doing and we let other teams worry about seeing us in the Tournament. If we are firing on all cylinders heading into the tourney I like our chances against lots of 2 and 3 seeds. In my mind it is all going to come down to figuring out the PG spot.This game has tournament implications.
If the tourney happened we’d be on the outside looking in. Win this and we have at least 1 top 75 win. Win against ucla and we have 2. While that’s stil bad, it’s at least ok for 6-9 seed
This game has tournament implications.
If the tourney happened we’d be on the outside looking in. Win this and we have at least 1 top 75 win. Win against ucla and we have 2. While that’s stil bad, it’s at least ok for 6-9 seed
This game has tournament implications.
If the tourney happened we’d be on the outside looking in. Win this and we have at least 1 top 75 win. Win against ucla and we have 2. While that’s stil bad, it’s at least ok for 6-9 seed
Lmao. Thank GOD we still have over 3 months and up to 25 more games before the tournament starts.
Why are so damn optimistic about a committee that has proven it has little to no respect for the AAC?
Literallly if we only beat Mississippi State it will be the worst shape we’ve ever been in in the non conference. A terrible SOS mixed with 1 top 100 win is bad. Sure we can make up some ground in the conference s season, but do you guys really really really really think that UC has a shot a even a 5 seed with 1 non conference top 100 win ?
And I meant if the tournament happened today. If it happened today we’d be out.
People keep talking about how bad the pac 12 and big 10 are and yet those leagues are better then ours, why do you think beating AAC teams will impress people?
This years season will depend on a Cinderella run. I’m fine with that. But it won’t be easy
Why are so damn optimistic about a committee that has proven it has little to no respect for the AAC?
Literallly if we only beat Mississippi State it will be the worst shape we’ve ever been in in the non conference. A terrible SOS mixed with 1 top 100 win is bad. Sure we can make up some ground in the conference s season, but do you guys really really really really think that UC has a shot a even a 5 seed with 1 non conference top 100 win ?
And I meant if the tournament happened today. If it happened today we’d be out.
People keep talking about how bad the pac 12 and big 10 are and yet those leagues are better then ours, why do you think beating AAC teams will impress people?
This years season will depend on a Cinderella run. I’m fine with that. But it won’t be easy
Don't you think it's important to realize we only had 3 games in conference to nab a column 1 win last year? SMU x 3? One of those was in tourney.
This year we could have WSU x3. SMU x 2. Houston and Temple away x 1. Maybe UCF away. Maybe even 1 more tourney game if we can face a top 50 neutral game in our first game.
It looks like (at worst) we are going to get twice as many shots at column 1 wins this year in conference (6-3) and at best maybe 3 times as many (9-3).
Don't you think it's important to realize we only had 3 games in conference to nab a column 1 win last year? SMU x 3? One of those was in tourney.
This year we could have WSU x3. SMU x 2. Houston and Temple away x 1. Maybe UCF away. Maybe even 1 more tourney game if we can face a top 50 neutral game in our first game.
It looks like (at worst) we are going to get twice as many shots at column 1 wins this year in conference (6-3) and at best maybe 3 times as many (9-3).
Quit counting the AAC tourney. It has zero implications