Great stuff you guys r great, shot 41% from 3 with Cumberland going 1-6 that’s pretty impressive, wish I could have seen Fredericks play, kind of seems like he is gonna be the guy that fills a lot of what Gary and Jacob brought to the table
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Off-season Canada trip
- Thread starter mdchick
- Start date
Help Support BearcatTalk:
Great stuff you guys r great, shot 41% from 3 with Cumberland going 1-6 that’s pretty impressive, wish I could have seen Fredericks play, kind of seems like he is gonna be the guy that fills a lot of what Gary and Jacob brought to the table
justinhub2003
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,583
Great stuff you guys r great, shot 41% from 3 with Cumberland going 1-6 that’s pretty impressive, wish I could have seen Fredericks play, kind of seems like he is gonna be the guy that fills a lot of what Gary and Jacob brought to the table
He has a nose for the ball. Great debut for him. Looks ready to play now
GarradJ21
Well-known member
Nice thanks
He has a nose for the ball. Great debut for him. Looks ready to play now
I think he plays 20-22 minutes or more a game.
Fredericks reminds me a lot of Titus Rubles in this small sample size, or a poorer shooting Jaquon Parker.
Key to this team will be which if any between Williams, Moore, and Jenifer step up in conference play.
We won't be able to blow teams out like the last 2 years, be ready for a lot more close games. Looks like a huge load will be put on Tre Scott this year with Brooks/Nsoseme being the other big men, and they look serviceable at best, expect the 5 to be our poorest position.
Scott and Williams were big highlights today.
Key to this team will be which if any between Williams, Moore, and Jenifer step up in conference play.
We won't be able to blow teams out like the last 2 years, be ready for a lot more close games. Looks like a huge load will be put on Tre Scott this year with Brooks/Nsoseme being the other big men, and they look serviceable at best, expect the 5 to be our poorest position.
Scott and Williams were big highlights today.
Bcatfollower
Well-known member
Fredericks reminds me a lot of Titus Rubles in this small sample size, or a poorer shooting Jaquon Parker.
Key to this team will be which if any between Williams, Moore, and Jenifer step up in conference play.
We won't be able to blow teams out like the last 2 years, be ready for a lot more close games. Looks like a huge load will be put on Tre Scott this year with Brooks/Nsoseme being the other big men, and they look serviceable at best, expect the 5 to be our poorest position.
Scott and Williams were big highlights today.
I have no evidence for this, but I think Diarra will shock some people this year.
GarradJ21
Well-known member
Fredericks reminds me a lot of Titus Rubles in this small sample size, or a poorer shooting Jaquon Parker.
Key to this team will be which if any between Williams, Moore, and Jenifer step up in conference play.
We won't be able to blow teams out like the last 2 years, be ready for a lot more close games. Looks like a huge load will be put on Tre Scott this year with Brooks/Nsoseme being the other big men, and they look serviceable at best, expect the 5 to be our poorest position.
Scott and Williams were big highlights today.
Why poorer shooting? I think Fredericks can shoot at a pretty high clip. His first year in JUCCO he shot 42% from 3. I don't remember Parker being lights out either. Just curious though, I didn't get to watch the game yesterday.
Why poorer shooting? I think Fredericks can shoot at a pretty high clip. His first year in JUCCO he shot 42% from 3. I don't remember Parker being lights out either. Just curious though, I didn't get to watch the game yesterday.
His form more than anything, and shooting 32% from 3 last year against weaker competition. Maybe I have nostalgia for Parker too. It looks like both don't look to shoot either, which I don't mind. Their first instinct is to move the ball or slash.
justinhub2003
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,583
His form more than anything, and shooting 32% from 3 last year against weaker competition. Maybe I have nostalgia for Parker too. It looks like both don't look to shoot either, which I don't mind. Their first instinct is to move the ball or slash.
32% against weaker competition sure, but he is also going to be less a focal point for opposing defenses. He will get clean looks and he knocked down a contested one yesterday.
His form is odd, but it makes his shot nearly unblockable and it has great rotation and Arc. I think he ends up splitting the middle and being about a 35-36% from 3
32% against weaker competition sure, but he is also going to be less a focal point for opposing defenses. He will get clean looks and he knocked down a contested one yesterday.
His form is odd, but it makes his shot nearly unblockable and it has great rotation and Arc. I think he ends up splitting the middle and being about a 35-36% from 3
I don't think thats far off. For what its worth Jaquon shot 37% and 40% his last two years. But only shot 100 in 34 games. I expect the same volume from Fredericks, with a slightly lower clip.
justinhub2003
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,583
Fredericks reminds me a lot of Titus Rubles in this small sample size, or a poorer shooting Jaquon Parker.
Key to this team will be which if any between Williams, Moore, and Jenifer step up in conference play.
We won't be able to blow teams out like the last 2 years, be ready for a lot more close games. Looks like a huge load will be put on Tre Scott this year with Brooks/Nsoseme being the other big men, and they look serviceable at best, expect the 5 to be our poorest position.
Scott and Williams were big highlights today.
I don't know how you could watch Nsesome and not be ultra impressed. He is going to lead the AAC in blocks at some point and IMO, his work ethic will help him score around the basket.
Brooks may never get it. He needs to learn how to be a jump shooter because the dude lets 6'5 guys guarding him feel like they're Shaq. He gets way too sped up
GarradJ21
Well-known member
So what's the plan for tonight? Basically just follow live tweets being that there is no stream?
What's everyone expecting? As mentioned, it's realistic that we could lose this game. Interested to see how this one plays out.
How does the Canada league work? I mean is it just like the NCAA but they have a Canadian version and Carleton is like the Blue Blood of Canada?
What's everyone expecting? As mentioned, it's realistic that we could lose this game. Interested to see how this one plays out.
How does the Canada league work? I mean is it just like the NCAA but they have a Canadian version and Carleton is like the Blue Blood of Canada?
So what's the plan for tonight? Basically just follow live tweets being that there is no stream?
What's everyone expecting? As mentioned, it's realistic that we could lose this game. Interested to see how this one plays out.
How does the Canada league work? I mean is it just like the NCAA but they have a Canadian version and Carleton is like the Blue Blood of Canada?
I honestly have no idea, but this team has won 3 of their last 4 games against NCAA D1 teams, including Alabama and Vandy last year. Take a W as a really good sign if it happens.
Is there any site to stream tonight’s game?
Supposedly UC themselves say no stream for tonights or tomorrows game. Only twitter following.
BearcatsNE
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2016
- Messages
- 104
Do t take these games so hard, it’s about figuring out roles. A lose now means nothing. But we must fix any problem that come out of it. It will all work out if we work hard on those issues.