UC 44 NCST 14
Pitt and Syracuse joining a weaker conference so they can win some football games.
There IS a football forum. Do you realize that?
UC 44 NCST 14
Pitt and Syracuse joining a weaker conference so they can win some football games.
I thought being in a weaker conference and being top dog is a good thing. Isn't that what you said in the other thread.
Yes, that is exactly correct. Pitt and Syracuse are joining a weaker conference so they have a better chance of winning and going to a BCS Bowl game. They know they could never beat the Bearcats, WVU, Louisville, etc.
As long as the Big East has its AQ to a BCS Bowl game the Big East is absolutely the conference UC should be in. Much better to replace Pitt and Syracuse with Navy and Air Force and ECU than to go up against Oklahoma and Texas as a steady diet.
No, when did that happen?
Yes, that is exactly correct. Pitt and Syracuse are joining a weaker conference so they have a better chance of winning and going to a BCS Bowl game. They know they could never beat the Bearcats, WVU, Louisville, etc.
As long as the Big East has its AQ to a BCS Bowl game the Big East is absolutely the conference UC should be in. Much better to replace Pitt and Syracuse with Navy and Air Force and ECU than to go up against Oklahoma and Texas as a steady diet.
Weak mentality. Would you want Big East basketball to be as easy as possible, also? That way making the tournament would be much easier.
Disagree about Pitt. They went from being in the best basketball conference by far to...being in the best basketball conference by far. (With syracuse and Pitt in the ACC. And possibly Uconn ).
Read the article. It has nothing to do with the best conference. It is about the style of play. Pitt worked in the Big East because their blue collar style works. It won't work that way in the ACC. The games are called differently. Pitt doesn't get the top basketball players. They win because Jamie Dixon is a great coach and he recruits the style of players needed to win in the Big East. When he leaves Pitt (and he will), I don't see them getting another coach as good as he is.
You don't think he can recruit the style of players needed to win the ACC? If he really is a great coach, I would think he would be able to. And- if he does leave Pitt- Sean Miller would have a very difficult decision to make. IMO, Pitt would go hard after him- Miller played at Pitt...I think thats one of the few schools in the country that could get Miller away from Arizona.
If they got Miller- they wouldn't miss a beat. Heck, he took Arizona to the elite 8 in his second year.
If they got Miller- they wouldn't miss a beat. Heck, he took Arizona to the elite 8 in his second year.
Pitt isn't a glamourous place to play. Can Jamie Dixon win with second tier players? Yep. Will Pitt win once he leaves? Nope.
So they could win with Howland and when he left they continued winning with Dixon, but once he leaves Pitt all of a sudden can't win? Doubtful.
That's a big IF though. I don't see Miller leaving Arizona any time soon.
Miller is a Pitt alum, I think he jumps at the chance. I know for a fact it's his dream job.