cincyguy13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
- Messages
- 4,633
Got it... so stating facts is dumb ?
I can’t help it thst Tre Scott is worse under Brannen then he was under mick.
Tre Scott had a 114 offensive rating his sophomore year
113 his JR year
And now this season has a 98.4... which is by far the worst of his career.
He was a good passing big but his assist rate is the lowest of his career.
I’m 100% positive Tre turns it around.
Your out here crucifying Tre Scott, even though he’s the one who learned a new system after 4 years of an old one and your giving zero grace. But people giving all kinds of excuses for CJB and this terrible start isn’t his fault.
Tre and Jarron have had career worst numbers under Brannen’s system, and Keith has improved. But he was already improving year over year. His jumps from freshmen to sophomore was incredible and were seeing a star player being born for what should be an amazing senior season.
Listen.... you can spin it how ever you want. The reality is UC returned its top 3 scorers, it’s leading assist guy and its leading rebounder.
Lololol and one of those guys was z as preseason all American and nod your acting like the returning players don’t matter:
Kenpom’s started us 24th in kenpom because the metrics said we should be good.
And I love how you try to invalidate the top 3 scorers returning. Like yea, if Brannen inherited a team who returned its 3 best players from a team that won 5 games, then I’d see your point. But that’s not the case, he returned 3 leading players from a 28 win team and one of them was a preseason all American. I don’t understand how your trying to spin this.
The all American is hurt. (I think, who knows). That seems to be an important part of this equation. Do you think we would have won 28 games last year with Jarron hurt?
Just saying, 2 of the 3 returning leading scorers were never considered good scorers. Throw in all the metrics you want, literally no one ever looked at Tre and said, “that guy can score”. You keep saying we return leading scorers and UCLA doesn’t but UCLA has far better talent. Aside from Jarron.
And your right, anyone can spin it any way they want. That’s why it’s fun to argue about.
Last edited: