cincrulz11
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
- Messages
- 4,329
Ody Oguama just committed to us
Solid get. I think he'll split time with Koval at the 5. We should be set on the interior if Lakhin stays. With the last scholarship I would take the best senior available, but I wouldn't pass on an underclassman upgrade.Ody Oguama just committed to us
Looks like a decent squad. Could be a bubble team if we schedule easy. Not saying I want that, but it does work to get in the conversation. There will be wins in our league.PG: DeJulius 20 / Saunders 20
SG: MAW 25 / McGinnis 15
SF: Newman 25 / Mason 15
PF: Davenport 25 / Hensley 10 / Ody 5
C: Ody 15 / Koval 20 / Lakhin 5
Watching Ody's highlights, he's quick for his size and runs the court very well. Leaping ability looks average, but he uses his quickness to get in rebounding position against slower bigs. On offense he's almost exclusively a screener and back to the basket post scorer. 20 years ago he would have been a prototypical 4, but he can be a great 5 in the modern game. I wouldn't be surprised if he starts over Koval, and I could see them sharing the floor at times since their games are so different. Eventually Ody could be a good 4 if he can learn to shoot or develop a face up game.
PG: DeJulius 20 / Saunders 20
SG: MAW 25 / McGinnis 15
SF: Newman 25 / Mason 15
PF: Davenport 25 / Hensley 10 / Ody 5
C: Ody 15 / Koval 20 / Lakhin 5
Watching Ody's highlights, he's quick for his size and runs the court very well. Leaping ability looks average, but he uses his quickness to get in rebounding position against slower bigs. On offense he's almost exclusively a screener and back to the basket post scorer. 20 years ago he would have been a prototypical 4, but he can be a great 5 in the modern game. I wouldn't be surprised if he starts over Koval, and I could see them sharing the floor at times since their games are so different. Eventually Ody could be a good 4 if he can learn to shoot or develop a face up game.
That guy was killing people for saying they didn't want Eric Martin because he had never been a HC.
Now he spends his time bashing Wes Miller, who was actually hired. I don't even read his posts, but i saw his name and your response, so I'm just taking a wild guess.
Just chill and let it play out. You can't land the studs first or the role players and younger guys may not come on board for the quality depth and development we need. We are still going to land a stud from the portal. There is a good chance another spot will open up somehow for a 2nd high quality player TBD.
At that point we will have what we need to be very competitive and still build for the future. It ain't over...the best is likely still to come.
If they need a spot banks already knows the deal. He came to UC with the entire purpose of being a walkon. Him being on scholarship now doesnt mean anything other than he doesnt have to pay to go to school for spring semester or summer classes. Very very slight chance he stays on scholarship, and if they need the spot there is a 0% chance he stays on scholarship
In terms of our bigs. With Lakhin likely headed back I have re-watched some video. He is quite a bit more mobile than Koval and a lot more skilled than Oguama. At 6'10 or 6'11 I am not sure what is going to be better in the portal. As long as Vik has recovered from his surgery and gets in the Factory...we should be just fine. He and Koval can shoot so we can play with either of them with Ody on the floor when we need to go big. It also gives us 15 fouls to give at the 5 if we need it.
I am back to being good with our big situation. Let's get that alpha scorer on the perimeter and call it a day!
I see more of a 17-25 minutes split between core players. Miller damn near go play entire roster. Davenport not playing 30minMy thoughts right now on potential playing time. My effort to get everyone 10 minutes except Banks. I know it won't work out this way. And if we add a tallish stud wing it's going to throw this rotation out the window.
5. Koval 15/ Ody 15/ Lakhin 10
4. Davenport 20/ Ody 10/ Hensley 10
3. Newman 25/ Davenport 10/McGinnis 5
2. MAW 20/ Madsen 15/ McGinnis 5
1. Dejulius 25/ Saunders 15
Davenport 30
Newman 25
Ody 25
Dejulius 25
MAW 20
Madsen 15
Saunders 15
Koval 15
McGinnis 10
Lakhin 10
Hensley 10
Banks 0
My thoughts right now on potential playing time. My effort to get everyone 10 minutes except Banks. I know it won't work out this way. And if we add a tallish stud wing it's going to throw this rotation out the window.
5. Koval 15/ Ody 15/ Lakhin 10
4. Davenport 20/ Ody 10/ Hensley 10
3. Newman 25/ Davenport 10/McGinnis 5
2. MAW 20/ Madsen 15/ McGinnis 5
1. Dejulius 25/ Saunders 15
Davenport 30
Newman 25
Ody 25
Dejulius 25
MAW 20
Madsen 15
Saunders 15
Koval 15
McGinnis 10
Lakhin 10
Hensley 10
Banks 0
With the current roster construction I see Madsen backing up Newman at the 3. He seems a little longer than McGinnis and not as quick. It's not his natural position, but I think I'd rather have him than Davenport there. Ideally we bring in a natural 3 (someone like Meikkel Murray).I'm most interested to see how the minutes get distributed at the guard spots.
Saunders, Madsen, McGinnis and MAW will all be able to make a case for why they should be playing 20+/game.
I’ll take Davenport at 3 all day. Maybe even at the 2 over 4. He gets destroyed in paint and horrible rebounderWith the current roster construction I see Madsen backing up Newman at the 3. He seems a little longer than McGinnis and not as quick. It's not his natural position, but I think I'd rather have him than Davenport there. Ideally we bring in a natural 3 (someone like Meikkel Murray).
Maybe if we were a slow paced passive defense team. I can't imagine trying to play pressure defense with Davenport and two players slower than him on the court.I’ll take Davenport at 3 all day. Maybe even at the 2 over 4. He gets destroyed in paint and horrible rebounder