In a 2 team race, with two teams head and shoulders above the rest, how does SMU land 1 player on first team and Cincy none? Total bull$%#!. Both SMU and Cincy easily handled Houston and pretty much everyone else.
Think about it this way,: what does it say about Houston's team and coach if they have two of the best 5 players in the league, but can't beat either of the two top teams, including one with no players in the Top 5. Isn't that an indictment in itself?
This tells me that the lower rung teams did not want to load the first team with SMU or Cincy players and held out their vote. That's just absurd.
Hopefully we will get a chance at a tie-breaker with you guys in the conference tournament and I'm hopeful each of us will have a nice run in the NCAAs.
After all, the weight and credibility of this conference (this year) rests on the shoulders of our respective teams.
Think about it this way,: what does it say about Houston's team and coach if they have two of the best 5 players in the league, but can't beat either of the two top teams, including one with no players in the Top 5. Isn't that an indictment in itself?
This tells me that the lower rung teams did not want to load the first team with SMU or Cincy players and held out their vote. That's just absurd.
Hopefully we will get a chance at a tie-breaker with you guys in the conference tournament and I'm hopeful each of us will have a nice run in the NCAAs.
After all, the weight and credibility of this conference (this year) rests on the shoulders of our respective teams.