Future teams

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

Oh you mean the ones who said Cronin was going to UCLA if offered a week before it happened, that Van Exel had no shot and it was Brannen's job days before it happened, or what about Cumberland entering the draft and Brooks transferring days before they both happened.

Sit down, youre out of your league here

Other than Brooks transferring, I don’t believe any of this information was much of a surprise to any Bearcat fan.
 
Other than Brooks transferring, I don’t believe any of this information was much of a surprise to any Bearcat fan.

I mean you say that now but if I told any Bearcat fan that these serious of events would occur around a month ago, most would have called me crazy
 
Are you not able just to post it?

I don't post that type of information here anymore. In the past I would but if what my sources told me wouldn't happen 1,000% exactly how they said it would every single time, I would get slammed by members. So no, I'm not posting that type of information anymore.
 
No matter how many times I was correct in the past, the couple of times my sources were incorrect I got blasted. So the few ruined it for the many.
 
I mean you say that now but if I told any Bearcat fan that these serious of events would occur around a month ago, most would have called me crazy

Cumberland was going to declare for the draft whether Cronin had stayed or left. If Cronin were offered the UCLA job he would have taken it is also a given - it’s UCLA, a job you have to take if offered to you. Brannen had been identified as a potential replacement even before Cronin had decided to leave. Van Exel was an interesting idea to succeed Cronin, but it simply didn’t make sense once you consider all factors. So, I’ll grant you the Brooks news as being unforseeable. But the rest isn’t truly ground breaking.
 
I don't understand some people.

I personally want anyone that has heard anything from any sort of reasonable source (not your sister's best friend's mom that works as a waitress at skyline) to post or share. Won't always be right, but it's always interesting.

hell - if you had sources close to me during my last job change....you would have gotten different answers depending on the day...and they would have been correct at the moment but didn't pan out long term.
 
Cumberland was going to declare for the draft whether Cronin had stayed or left. If Cronin were offered the UCLA job he would have taken it is also a given - it’s UCLA, a job you have to take if offered to you. Brannen had been identified as a potential replacement even before Cronin had decided to leave. Van Exel was an interesting idea to succeed Cronin, but it simply didn’t make sense once you consider all factors. So, I’ll grant you the Brooks news as being unforseeable. But the rest isn’t truly ground breaking.

So then, do you have any groundbreaking information?
 
Back
Top