Bearcatboy
Well-known member
Mick loves experience we all know that and IMO he will stick with Guyn and Thomas as the starters but that doesn't mean we can't have the best 6th man (Cobb).
Mick pulls people for bad defense not shots.Cobb and Ellis definitely look like the two best players out there. Ellis has been the most consistent but even without his shooting Cobb seems the most composed on offense (him, not Caupain was the one that knew how to break the press). Add in his deadly range and he needs to be on the floor at all times. Hopefully last night gets him a start.
Guyn and Sanders did very little. Still not sure what Guyn adds to this team. Sanders is okay for an occasional wide open 3 but that's about it.
Shaq is incredibly disappointing. I know Mick says he doesn't pull guys for bad shots but he should and Shaq should be pulled every time he takes a 3. Why does Mick pull players for turnovers when a bad shot is the same thing?
Caupain has been disappointing me so far this season. Even though his stat line was good last night he never looked like the floor leader. He took some bad shots, made lazy passes, and still looks too slow. I'm confident he will turn it around because he impressed me last season.
I'm hoping KJ needs to get a rythm going because so far he hasn't done anything to deserve PT. Same with Morman.
All big guys except Ellis look really slow. I like the potential of Moore but it's going to take some time. And I hope I'm wrong about Clark but I do not see what the hype was about him. He looks slow footed, timid, and from watching him shoot in warmups he doesn't appear to have any face up game. At least he looks like he can rebound. I'm waiting to see the athleticism we all have been hearing about. Hopefully he is just having a slow start while he gets his legs under him.
Mick loves experience we all know that and IMO he will stick with Guyn and Thomas as the starters but that doesn't mean we can't have the best 6th man (Cobb).
Mick pulls people for bad defense not shots
If Guyn and Thomas continue to start, we will continue to get off to slow starts offensively. And that is the last thing we need. I would like to see Sanders starting over Shaq and anyone on the team over Guyn. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if Mick stuck with those guys anyway.
They can also be rebounded for a put back. They also result in fewer transition opportunities than live ball turnovers.I'm pretty sure I said he doesn't pull people for bad shots? Turnovers and defense, that's it. And to the other person who said it was a cliche, it certainly isn't. Is a bad shot literally the same thing as a turnover? Of course not, but they are very similar. Bad shots rarely go in, hence the reason they are called bad shots.
They can also be rebounded for a put back. They also result in fewer transition opportunities than live ball turnovers.
And if we're getting right down to it, take a look at the expectation.
Hypothetically I think we would all agree if a guys career 3pt% is 20% we don't want him shooting 3's.
Still on average that shot is worth .6 of a point.
During the Mick era we've scored between 1.01 and 1.09 pts per possession over the course of a season.
Getting half of that production on a possession vs ZERO makes a huge difference.
Clark reminds me of another player who was an incredible bust in our program. He has no offensive game. He looks slow. He looks timid. I hate it when we recruit these type of players. That damn "bust" of a player coincidently was from North carolina also. His name was Eric Hicks. He even ended up quitting the team for a brief period as a freshman and only averaged 2 points per game. Everyone was highly disappointed with him too. Looks like we've probably got another one of those types of players with Clark.
Is this for real?
Clark reminds me of another player who was an incredible bust in our program. He has no offensive game. He looks slow. He looks timid. I hate it when we recruit these type of players. That damn "bust" of a player coincidently was from North carolina also. His name was Eric Hicks. He even ended up quitting the team for a brief period as a freshman and only averaged 2 points per game. Everyone was highly disappointed with him too. Looks like we've probably got another one of those types of players with Clark.
I think he was being sarcastic, albeit a poor attempt at sarcasm.
I think he was being sarcastic, albeit a poor attempt at sarcasm.