NTS-ology

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

Summary...

I correctly picked 64/68 teams.

I correctly picked 36 teams on the exact seed line.

I correctly picked 52/68 teams within 1 seed line.

I had St. Mary's, San Diego St, Monmouth and St. Bonnies in.

The committee clearly overvalued the mid-tier PAC 12. I had Colorado at 10 (was 8), USC at 11 (was 8), Oregon State at 10 (was 7). Yet somehow Arizona was only a 6? Still makes no sense to me.

I had Kentucky at 3 and Texas A&M at 5, somehow A&M got a 3 but Kentucky was a 4? Also makes no sense.

Terrible job by committee. They should have used my bracket...

Not bad, not bad at all
 
Haven't posted it publicly, but here is my projections coming into today's games. This is completely metric based with some of my own discretion at obvious points.

1 SEEDS:
Kansas
Virginia
Villanova
Michigan State

2 SEEDS:
North Carolina
Oklahoma
West Virginia
Oregon

3 SEEDS:
Kentucky
Miami-FL
Xavier
Purdue

4 SEEDS:
Utah
Indiana
Iowa State
California

5 SEEDS:
Maryland
Texas A&M
Arizona
Duke


6 SEEDS:
Iowa
Baylor
Seton Hall
Texas


7 SEEDS:
Wisconsin
Wichita State
Connecticut
Notre Dame


8 SEEDS:
St. Joesph's
VCU
San Diego State
Dayton

9 SEEDS:
Gonzaga
St. Mary's
Cincinnati
Texas Tech

10 SEEDS:
Yale
Providence
Vanderbilt
Colorado


11 SEEDS:
Valporaiso
Colorado
Butler/Michigan
Pittsburgh/USC


12 SEEDS:
Oregon State
Little Rock
Stephen F. Austin
Akron


13 SEEDS:
South Dakota State
UNC-Wilmington
Northern Iowa
Hawaii


14 SEEDS:
Iona
Stony Brook
Chattanooga
Middle Tennessee

15 SEEDS:
New Mexico State
Green Bay
Weber State
UNC-Asheville


16 SEEDS:
Florida Gulf Coast
Hampton
Austin Peay
Southern
Faireligh Dickinson
Holy Cross

Last 4 in: USC, Butler, Pittsburgh, Michigan
First 4 out: Florida, South Carolina, Syracuse, Princeton
Next 4 out: St. Bonnies, Tulsa, Monmouth, Georgia

NTS. Just curious. You say use BPI, plus a little of your own opinion. But surely you did more than just turn the BPI into an S curve bracket. What else was involved? Sounds like you wanted to avoid subjectivity.
 
NTS. Just curious. You say use BPI, plus a little of your own opinion. But surely you did more than just turn the BPI into an S curve bracket. What else was involved? Sounds like you wanted to avoid subjectivity.

BPI, KenPom, Sagarin, and RPI averaged.
 
Back
Top