OT - NBA

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

I'll choose to live in reality, rather than debate your hypothetical. Klay Thompson is the 2nd best player btw. And you are acting like Dwayne Wade doesn't exist. Go ahead and check out his Game Logs from their playoff runs. C'mon man. Stop being such a hater.

Reality is they would get embarrassed if Lebron and steph switched. D wade was good with Lebron wasn't the same wade from 2006 and was limited that last finals trip in Miami tho. But they never had a finals mvp come off the bench. The Warriors imo are the deepest team in nba history
 
Best player right now is debatable. Curry's defending champions went 73-9 in the West. That's not nothing.

The Warriors are defending champs that team is steph didn't dominate the finals last year Andre got the mvp for a reason. Lebron single handley won two games last year against them and it is a fact he was the best player on the floor. Just because a player is on a lot better of a team doesn't make him the better player. Lebron can affect the game is so many different ways than curry can. I'm not a hater watching curry is awesome the kid can straight up play. But Lebron with his rebounding defense passing and scoring just does more than curry and is the best in he world
 
Reality is they would get embarrassed if Lebron and steph switched. D wade was good with Lebron wasn't the same wade from 2006 and was limited that last finals trip in Miami tho. But they never had a finals mvp come off the bench. The Warriors imo are the deepest team in nba history

Lol. Umm, no. That's not reality. That's you making up something that no one can prove and hammering it home bc it's all you have. If you had reality to support your case, you wouldn't have to go there. You look like a big time hater when you say stuff like that.
 
Lol. Umm, no. That's not reality. That's you making up something that no one can prove and hammering it home bc it's all you have. If you had reality to support your case, you wouldn't have to go there. You look like a big time hater when you say stuff like that.

Not at all that doesn't make me a hater. So everyone that says mj wouldn't have went 2-4 in the finals if he were in Lebrons shoes is a big time hater?

Any basketball person knows if Lebron and steph switched it wouldn't be a series
 
13 years, never been hurt and has a career AVERAGE of 27 points, 7 assists and 7 rebounds. Argubably the most consistent player of all time.
 
Steph is great Lebron does more things greater it's as simple as that

That's your opinion. I'm not a huge Steph/Warriors fan btw. I just love good basketball. You don't seem to be capable of removing your emotional attachment to Lebron in this debate. And you seem to be putting more weight on Steph's 11 points tonight, over his unbelievable season.
 
13 years, never been hurt and has a career AVERAGE of 27 points, 7 assists and 7 rebounds. Argubably the most consistent player of all time.

Not debating any of that. LeBron might be the best ever. As I said, he has had a better career than Steph.
 
That's your opinion. I'm not a huge Steph/Warriors fan btw. I just love good basketball. You don't seem to be capable of removing your emotional attachment to Lebron in this debate. And you seem to be putting more weight on Steph's 11 points tonight, over his unbelievable season.
Ok I'm back last post haha
I love good basketball too and I'm not to attached just a huge nba guy. It's not just the 11 I'm just referring too. Steph is a great player had a fantastic season but he does benefit from being in a great system with great smart role players. If he was ever put in situations like just for example Lebron was in last year in the finals with 0 help I do not believe steph could carry a team like that and give them a legitimate chance like Lebron was able to to do. But as you said that's just my opinion

Here's how I measure greatest in the world. Would the 76ers have gotten more wins if they had Lebron or curry. Imo Lebron by a decent margin too
 
Ok I'm back last post haha
I love good basketball too and I'm not to attached just a huge nba guy. It's not just the 11 I'm just referring too. Steph is a great player had a fantastic season but he does benefit from being in a great system with great smart role players. If he was ever put in situations like just for example Lebron was in last year in the finals with 0 help I do not believe steph could carry a team like that and give them a legitimate chance like Lebron was able to to do. But as you said that's just my opinion

Here's how I measure greatest in the world. Would the 76ers have gotten more wins if they had Lebron or curry. Imo Lebron by a decent margin too

But what's that system without Steph? His ability to stretch the floor like no one ever has no doubt makes the job easier for every role player. I dunno. I just love the NBA too. We could debate this stuff forever.
 
13 years, never been hurt and has a career AVERAGE of 27 points, 7 assists and 7 rebounds. Argubably the most consistent player of all time.

And played on some teams that were downright awful in Cleveland but he made contenders essentially by himself. That 2007 team had no business being in the finals. I love watching Steph play but I don't think Steph could do that.
 
And played on some teams that were downright awful in Cleveland but he made contenders essentially by himself. That 2007 team had no business being in the finals. I love watching Steph play but I don't think Steph could do that.

No business even being in the playoffs really lol. Hard to hold his Finals record against him. If he falls to 2-5 after this year, he'll get blasted. If he was 2-0 though, he wouldn't get as much criticism. Weird how that works. I'd understand it more if he hadn't won any championships yet.
 
Right coach im taking Westbrook over curry also. You rough curry up(lebron was doing) he's nothing
 
Iggy on his way to another finals mvp. He win couple more rings he might get Hall of fame consideration
 
No business even being in the playoffs really lol. Hard to hold his Finals record against him. If he falls to 2-5 after this year, he'll get blasted. If he was 2-0 though, he wouldn't get as much criticism. Weird how that works. I'd understand it more if he hadn't won any championships yet.

Hundred percent agree lots of critics use the finals record against him, making it seem in terms of legecy in there eyes that it would be better to lose in the conference finals to keep a better finals record which baffles me. Win or lose 6 straight appearances is an accomplishemnt
 
Back
Top