Savannah State

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

played pg in high school, was recruited as a pg, played pg, playing pg as a professional.


i dont know why people can't accept it. caupain is NOT an off the ball player at all and he's not a shooter or a slasher.


certainly caupain had limitations as a player but everybody thinking he was out of position and wasn't a real pg missed all the things he did really well and really missed one hell of a career.

Yea IMO Troy is and was a PG. I mean he is the all time assists leader at UC.

He was a big bruising PG. and IMO, the only other position Troy could really play was a really undersized 4 in a small lineup. He doesn't shoot well enough to be a 2 or 3. He can however guard bigger guys than him and also post up well for a PG. But reality is; he is a true PG.
 
Yea IMO Troy is and was a PG. I mean he is the all time assists leader at UC.

He was a big bruising PG. and IMO, the only other position Troy could really play was a really undersized 4 in a small lineup. He doesn't shoot well enough to be a 2 or 3. He can however guard bigger guys than him and also post up well for a PG. But reality is; he is a true PG.

I think what we see now is a different style of a point guard in a high tempo game. Both point guards but a different style game.
 
played pg in high school, was recruited as a pg, played pg, playing pg as a professional.


i dont know why people can't accept it. caupain is NOT an off the ball player at all and he's not a shooter or a slasher.


certainly caupain had limitations as a player but everybody thinking he was out of position and wasn't a real pg missed all the things he did really well and really missed one hell of a career.

agree
 
I think we have a quality starter and a quality backup which is nice. I feel the most comfortable this year of maybe all Cronin years using our backup.

Jenifer really has come a long way. He's really put the effort in and has listened to coach and has now been rewarded with a start and legit playing time. We don't need him to score but fortunately he can do that a little as well. His shot is much better and he takes care of the ball. He can run the break very well. Passing is very good. Obviously it would be nice if he were a few inches taller and could make them FT's...but outside of that...he can ball a little bit.

I like watching him get after it on D and press too. He's not going to use his long arms to get deflections but he will get right up under you and make it difficult to put the ball on the floor. He's got no problem with facilitating and he takes smart shots. He's got good energy as well and he pumps himself up when he makes a good defensive play. I like it when players get excited about a good defensive play and not just making a big shot.

he's a good kid and I like him more and more.
 
Yea IMO Troy is and was a PG. I mean he is the all time assists leader at UC.

He was a big bruising PG. and IMO, the only other position Troy could really play was a really undersized 4 in a small lineup. He doesn't shoot well enough to be a 2 or 3. He can however guard bigger guys than him and also post up well for a PG. But reality is; he is a true PG.

He was a mediocre PG at best when considering all his skills....both offensive and defensive, which is why the team accomplished very little during his era other than regular season wins in a fairly weak mid-major conference, and a pathetic OOC schedule. In post season play, when the competition got tougher, the record speaks for itself. In the 4 NCAA knockout games against a little better competition (Harvard, Kentucky, St. Joe, UCLA), he was a combined 10 for 37 from the field, with 10 assists (2.5/game), 9 Turnovers (2.25/game), and 32 points (8/game). The opposition PGs were a combined 19-41 from the field, 20 assists, 5 turnovers, and 61 points.

I am excited that Mick got Cane Broome, and that he continues to develop Justin Jenifer into a fine backup and sometimes starter. The point guard position has been upgraded significantly. Troy Caupain had a nice career, but we will see this offense elevate itself through improved point guard play this year.
 
He was a mediocre PG at best when considering all his skills....both offensive and defensive, which is why the team accomplished very little during his era other than regular season wins in a fairly weak mid-major conference, and a pathetic OOC schedule. In post season play, when the competition got tougher, the record speaks for itself. In the 4 NCAA knockout games against a little better competition (Harvard, Kentucky, St. Joe, UCLA), he was a combined 10 for 37 from the field, with 10 assists (2.5/game), 9 Turnovers (2.25/game), and 32 points (8/game). The opposition PGs were a combined 19-41 from the field, 20 assists, 5 turnovers, and 61 points.

I am excited that Mick got Cane Broome, and that he continues to develop Justin Jenifer into a fine backup and sometimes starter. The point guard position has been upgraded significantly. Troy Caupain had a nice career, but we will see this offense elevate itself through improved point guard play this year.

I would say Troy was a very solid PG. I would grade him out as a B overall but maybe not an A and definitely not a mediocre C. He may not have played so well in the tourney but his numbers in big games overall (in his career) were better than many of his playing partners. Troy did not pad his stats against patsies...I remember doing some checking on that. He actually facilitated against patsies more and got bigger in bigger games. Cronin trusted him for 2 years to be the "closer" in close games. It would have been nice if Troy had some help in that department. Obviously we weren't going to use bigs to close out games because you need someone who can create a good look at the basket and bigs can get doubled in a hurry. Evans was not that guy and Cumberland was only becoming that guy towards the end. KJ was not in any way..."that guy". SK was the only "closer" we have had in recent years besides Troy...and every team knew who was getting the ball in crunch time.

Putting all that on his shoulders is probably ill informed. Troy got a lot out of a little. Most of his career he worked with guys who had little to no NBA potential. He didn't care or complain...he just did what he could. He made mediocre teams better in general with the possible exception of last year when we really had a very good team...but still no help with closing games until Cumberland came on in the end.
 
Last edited:
I would say Troy was a very solid PG. I would grade him out as a B overall but maybe not an A and definitely not a mediocre C. He may not have played so well in the tourney but his numbers in big games overall (in his career) were better than many of his playing partners. Troy did not pad his stats against patsies...I remember doing some checking on that. He actually facilitated against patsies more and got bigger in bigger games. Cronin trusted him for 2 years to be the "closer" in close games. It would have been nice if Troy had some help in that department. Obviously we weren't going to use bigs to close out games because you need someone who can create a good look at the basket and bigs can get doubled in a hurry. Evans was not that guy and Cumberland was only becoming that guy towards the end. KJ was not in any way..."that guy". SK was the only "closer" we have had in recent years besides Troy...and every team knew who was getting the ball in crunch time.

Putting all that on his shoulders is probably ill informed. Troy got a lot out of a little. Most of his career he worked with guys who had little to no NBA potential. He didn't care or complain...he just did what he could. He made mediocre teams better in general with the possible exception of last year when we really had a very good team...but still no help with closing games until Cumberland came on in the end.

I go to the games. My mediocre comment is based on the eye test, not his stats. It is based on the stuff that people have talked about for the last 4 years on these sites.....i.e. his walking the ball up the court, looking at Mick to tell him what to do, poor shooting, poor defense, etc. His standout stat was assist to turnover ratio, but I would argue that by the time that he wasted away most of the shot clock, he either shot a rushed three as the clock ran out, or made one of his typical diagonal passes to the wing for a rushed three, or our well known "pass the ball around the 3-pt. line" till someone throws up a late three. That style wouldn't really create a whole lot of turnover opportunities. He shot way too much for being a low percentage shooter, therefore, he made enough to get his points per game to a respectable number, and of course, his assists to turnover ratio looked impressive. I'm more of a B- to C+ for him, which I consider somewhat mediocre, but I certainly could agree that overall, he had a good career. 4 years from now, I don't think anyone will be remembering a whole lot about Troy Caupain and that is because these current and future point guards will easily make us forget him. That is my prediction. No sense beating this dead horse. Everyone has made up their opinion on him, including me. He's gone. The new guys are here now and this team is exciting!!! Let's get excited for what's ahead. It's been a while since we've had this level of talent and great expectations!
 
Last edited:
I go to the games. My mediocre comment is based on the eye test, not his stats. It is based on the stuff that people have talked about for the last 4 years on these sites.....i.e. his walking the ball up the court, looking at Mick to tell him what to do, poor shooting, poor defense, etc. His standout stat was assist to turnover ratio, but I would argue that by the time that he wasted away most of the shot clock, he either shot a rushed three as the clock ran out, or made one of his typical diagonal passes to the wing for a rushed three, or our well known "pass the ball around the 3-pt. line" till someone throws up a late three. That style wouldn't really create a whole lot of turnover opportunities. He shot way too much for being a low percentage shooter, therefore, he made enough to get his points per game to a respectable number, and of course, his assists to turnover ratio looked impressive. I'm more of a B- to C+ for him, which I consider somewhat mediocre, but I certainly could agree that overall, he had a good career. 4 years from now, I don't think anyone will be remembering a whole lot about Troy Caupain and that is because these current and future point guards will easily make us forget him. That is my prediction. No sense beating this dead horse. Everyone has made up their opinion on him, including me. He's gone. The new guys are here now and this team is exciting!!! Let's get excited for what's ahead. It's been a while since we've had this level of talent and great expectations!

Perhaps it would have been nice for Troy to pass the ball and have player A or B do something with it? That is precisely what wings are supposed to do. Do you think he would have been a better guard if someone did that? Do you think we ended up late in the shot clock all the time because Troy was the problem or because he had little help? We didn't have aggressive players on the perimeter. KJ was the antithesis of aggressive and Evans was not a creator. They did not drive the ball well. These guys were pass around the perimeter guys.

I agree we should be excited for the future. I didn't bring up Troy.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps it would have been nice for Troy to pass the ball and have player A or B do something with it? That is precisely what wings are supposed to do. Do you think he would have been a better guard if someone did that? Do you think we ended up late in the shot clock all the time because Troy was the problem or because he had little help? We didn't have aggressive players on the perimeter. KJ was the antithesis of aggressive and Evans was not a creator. They did not drive the ball well.

I agree we should be excited for the future. I didn't bring up Troy.

I absolutely do feel that his slow pace of play and running most of the shot clock out affected everyone in a negative way. We tended to rush a lot of shots rather than shooting relaxed and in rhythm. We rarely got easy shots in transition, because he wouldn't push the ball. Maybe Mick deserves some of that blame, but I heard him make comments a number of times indicating that he wanted to run, but Troy would slow it down on his own.

I know you didn't bring it up. Maybe I did, or maybe someone else did. Can't remember, but it has went on too long now, so we can all move on.
 
I absolutely do feel that his slow pace of play and running most of the shot clock out affected everyone in a negative way. We tended to rush a lot of shots rather than shooting relaxed and in rhythm. We rarely got easy shots in transition, because he wouldn't push the ball. Maybe Mick deserves some of that blame, but I heard him make comments a number of times indicating that he wanted to run, but Troy would slow it down on his own.

I know you didn't bring it up. Maybe I did, or maybe someone else did. Can't remember, but it has went on too long now, so we can all move on.

I think we could have run more last year but not sure it would help. When your wings don't take the ball and do something with it...and would rather pass it around...you are going to end up with late clock 3s either way. It was like "hot potato" for the last couple of years until Cumberland started going to the hoop.
 
we've never played with pace. that goes back a lot farther than caupain.

Its hard to say though. Pre Troy we were in the grind it out big east where we were out recruited and out talented in nearly every game. Slow and steady kept us in the game.

Then we moved to the American but we recruited a PG who was fit for the big east. He was too clutch and too good to not play so you had to adapt your style around it.

But the reality is; Mick started recruiting Skill over the last few years. You need skill to play fast and still be efficient. Once he had Skill he put in the motion offense and it worked.


I mean Cronin has made a clear philopshy change. He recruits skill and also changed his offensive style.

in 2015-16 pre motion offense: #70 ranked offense
In 2016-17 post motion offense: #34 ranked offense


Mick can clearly run a skilled team and knows what he is doing on the offensive end when he has the right personnel.
 
I was with you. I always thought he could still red shirt even though he played some, but everyone kept saying he couldn't so I believed them

Calling a Diarra redshirt was not a hard thing to do. I did as well. When he played a game the talk was over. Now that there is an injury maybe there is an out for him...but I doubt it's concrete.

He should have red shirted before game 1 IMO. We have Clark and Washington. We have obvious backups in Scott and Brooks. We also have Nsoseme. At one point in time we even had Moore figuring into the equation.

Bearcatboy was not Nostrodamas here....lol! It was easy pickings.
 
I think it’s going to be a medical redshirt exception granted by he NCAA

By normal rules, I think he couldn’t redshirt bc he played so late in the season
 
Back
Top