1-5 vs 5-1

[waterhead]

I should probably do some checking on this but has anyone noticed that the Bearcats have gone either 1-5 or 5-1 in the last 6 regular season games for about the last 5 years? The last two years we have been on the right side of that equation.

I remember a couple of years ago the biggest knock on Mick seemed to be that the team folded at the end of the season...more specifically the last 6 games.

I haven't heard a lot of those same people giving the credit when they were so quick to give the criticism. Mick has turned that stat around and deserves a little praise no?

 

[JasonS]

I should probably do some checking on this but has anyone noticed that the Bearcats have gone either 1-5 or 5-1 in the last 6 regular season games for about the last 5 years? The last two years we have been on the right side of that equation.

I remember a couple of years ago the biggest knock on Mick seemed to be that the team folded at the end of the season...more specifically the last 6 games.

I haven't heard a lot of those same people giving the credit when they were so quick to give the criticism. Mick has turned that stat around and deserves a little praise no?

Regardless of the numbers, it is pretty simple to explain. In Mick's first few years, he didn't have a lot of depth to work with. As a result the team wore down as the season went along. Now it is the opposite.