Better all time BB program?

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

waterhead

Senior Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
9,300
I noticed some OSU fan on a message board was trying to explain why OSU doesn't want to schedule UC. The rationale was that "big dominant schools" like OSU don't like to play in-state schools because the other teams are hell bent and motivated on winning big upsets. I responded that UC is generally very highly ranked as an all time program and that calling a win for UC over OSU as a program would not be considered an upset...historically speaking. Football might be another story. However, I did a little research...

I saw some stats on a site that gave a breakdown for a bunch of teams and ranked them as all time programs. I have seen other rankings as well. I decided to do my own ranking system. I used 4 stats that were available on almost all the teams on that site. National championships, Final Fours, NCAA appearances, and Conference Championships. I gave two points for a CC, 2 points for a NCAA appearance, 8 for a FF, and 32 for a NC. I would have included conference tourney wins had they been available for all the teams. I was planning on coming up with an all time 64 team NCAA bracket...but I only got down to 32 teams before I ran out of time.

Anyhow, using those stats UC ended up being in 9th place whenever the article was written. It went like this...UCLA, KY, NC, Kansas, Duke, Indiana, Uconn, UL, UC, OSU. So UC would have been the highest ranked 3 seed:) I think with a FF appearance OSU pulls ahead slightly...but not so much that it couldn't be argued that UC is a better all time program. If OSU were to get a NC it would probably close the door on that argument for the most part..although it would still be relatively close. All the other programs in the FF are already ahead of us.

I didn't look to see when the article was written but UC had 25 NCAA's, 32 CC's, 6 FF's and 2 NC's. OSU had 27 NCAA's, 25 CC's, 10 FF's (which has changed), and 1 NC.

Rounding out the Sweet 16 and Top 32 were in order...MSU, OSU (OK st), Ark, Syr, Ariz, GT...followed by...NC St, Mich, Vill, UNLV, FLA, ILL, Temp, San Fran, Marq, Wisc, Memph, Tex, Maryland, Princeton, OK, Purd.

I was relying on their limited data and for sure I know this year wasn't included in their stats.
 
I hate debating stuff like this because college basketball has changed so much since the 50's and 60's.

At one point, the NIT was considered on par or better with the NCAA. So you had NIT and NCAA champions that were both considered very good. Has OSU won any NIT championships or made any appearances? Should we weigh NCAA games/appearances/final fours/championships differently?

NCAA back then also took fewer teams and teams not in a conference were ineligible to be in the NCAA tourney I believe. Teams like Marquette were independent for awhile. Should that factor in?

In the end, UC and OSU are both great programs. Depending upon the person's point of view and parameters, you could end up with either OSU or UC being the better program. In the end, it just comes down to opinion.

If you are going strictly by NCAA Championships, then its UC
 
Last edited:
Uc is the best program in the state and top 5 in the country

After Micks done with uc, they will be in the ucla and uk discussion
 
I hate debating stuff like this because college basketball has changed so much since the 50's and 60's.

At one point, the NIT was considered on par or better with the NCAA. So you had NIT and NCAA champions that were both considered very good. Has OSU won any NIT championships or made any appearances? Should we weigh NCAA games/appearances/final fours/championships differently?

NCAA back then also took fewer teams and teams not in a conference were ineligible to be in the NCAA tourney I believe. Teams like Marquette were independent for awhile. Should that factor in?

In the end, UC and OSU are both great programs. Depending upon the person's point of view and parameters, you could end up with either OSU or UC being the better program. In the end, it just comes down to opinion.

If you are going strictly by NCAA Championships, then its UC


If I knew where to get all that information in one place I would probably factor in a few more things. If we are figuring NCAA NC's only I think we are tied for 8th and OSU is probably tied for like 15:)

7 teams with more than 2 NC's have won over half of the NCAA tourneys (38). The 14 multiple time winners have won nearly 3/4 (52) of the 72 titles.
 
All that matters is National Championships because that is why you play the game.

UC has 2.

Ohio State has 1.

Therefore, UC is the superior program to OSU.

UCLA is the most superior of all with 11.
 
In the end, UC and OSU are both great programs. Depending upon the person's point of view and parameters, you could end up with either OSU or UC being the better program. In the end, it just comes down to opinion.

If you are going strictly by NCAA Championships, then its UC

The ranking of overall programs is always very whimsical. The only way to numerically calculate the "better" program depends on a bunch of arbitrary values attached to cherry-picked statistical categories. At the end of the day, it's inconclusive and debatable, at best.
 
The ranking of overall programs is always very whimsical. The only way to numerically calculate the "better" program depends on a bunch of arbitrary values attached to cherry-picked statistical categories. At the end of the day, it's inconclusive and debatable, at best.


I understand that you can't have absolute rankings that everyone agrees on. I guess the point is we can go toe to toe with OSU historically but maybe not KY. You can't really cherry pick your way ahead of KY very easily and sound credible.

After reading through some message boards I was getting the impression that lots of fans of both UC and OSU look at OSU as "big brother". Why are some of our fans clammoring so much to play OSU in the regular season? Why is it not the other way around? I understand football...but basketball?

That's why I wanted to point out all the NCAA appearances, conference championships, national titles and final fours...and compare them with OSU. We don't need games against OSU to gain credibilty as a program. We just need to do a better job of educating people of our program's history...including our own fans.
 
I understand that you can't have absolute rankings that everyone agrees on. I guess the point is we can go toe to toe with OSU historically but maybe not KY. You can't really cherry pick your way ahead of KY very easily and sound credible.

After reading through some message boards I was getting the impression that lots of fans of both UC and OSU look at OSU as "big brother". Why are some of our fans clammoring so much to play OSU in the regular season? Why is it not the other way around? I understand football...but basketball?

That's why I wanted to point out all the NCAA appearances, conference championships, national titles and final fours...and compare them with OSU. We don't need games against OSU to gain credibilty as a program. We just need to do a better job of educating people of our program's history...including our own fans.

You're right and I guess that's why its so frustrating. Uneducated fans only consider the last decade maybe. And Ohio state just thinks they're better than everyone period. They don't have to have reasons; they are better because they just are. Buckeyes could go to the Vatican and argue with the pope they have a better chance at heaven than him. It's just who they are.
 
The main, driving reason as to why OSU does not play UC is simple economics. Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Toledo are huge fan bases for their program. Should they make match ups a routine event, that could possibly alienate or distort that base. Back in the late 80's a poll was done in the Tri State area showing OSU football was more popular than the local UC program. If those ties were weakened, it could damage a base that routinely makes the trip to Columbus in theory. I do not completely agree with this, but it weighs on OSU. As far as UC owning them, please be a realist. When has UC beaten them at anything Ralph/Mick/etc. OSU owns Ohio in every sport outside of baseball.
 
The main, driving reason as to why OSU does not play UC is simple economics. Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Toledo are huge fan bases for their program. Should they make match ups a routine event, that could possibly alienate or distort that base. Back in the late 80's a poll was done in the Tri State area showing OSU football was more popular than the local UC program. If those ties were weakened, it could damage a base that routinely makes the trip to Columbus in theory. I do not completely agree with this, but it weighs on OSU. As far as UC owning them, please be a realist. When has UC beaten them at anything Ralph/Mick/etc. OSU owns Ohio in every sport outside of baseball.

UC is 2-0 vs Ohio State in National Championship games, National Championships are all that matters in basketball. Ohio State is afraid to play UC home and home as they know they will lose.
 
UC is 2-0 vs Ohio State in National Championship games, National Championships are all that matters in basketball. Ohio State is afraid to play UC home and home as they know they will lose.

That was 50 years ago Mick. What has UC done against OSU since then? It is a "what have you done lately world" and you are just a bit out of touch.
 
That was 50 years ago Mick. What has UC done against OSU since then? It is a "what have you done lately world" and you are just a bit out of touch.


Nope, National Championships are all that counts.

UC 2-0 vs Ohio State in the only 2 games that mattered.

UC 2 National Championships, OSU 1.

Comeback when OSU wins another one to move into a tie with UC.
 
The main, driving reason as to why OSU does not play UC is simple economics. Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Toledo are huge fan bases for their program. Should they make match ups a routine event, that could possibly alienate or distort that base. Back in the late 80's a poll was done in the Tri State area showing OSU football was more popular than the local UC program. If those ties were weakened, it could damage a base that routinely makes the trip to Columbus in theory. I do not completely agree with this, but it weighs on OSU. As far as UC owning them, please be a realist. When has UC beaten them at anything Ralph/Mick/etc. OSU owns Ohio in every sport outside of baseball.


Realist? I think you might want to try some of that. I don't recall anyone bringing up "owning" anyone. They have only played head to head 4 times since 61. They are 2-2 now since then. You can't own someone you play 4 times in 50 years and split records with. Historically speaking UC BB does not take a back seat to any team from Ohio...and that includes OSU. OSU has more fans...but I am talking about BB accomplishemtns.

If you go back 20 years...I think you will find UC stood pretty tall in college BB. When you go back 50 years...it only gets better. If you just want to cherry pick the last 5-6 years after the UC BB program was decimated you could find a way to rationalize whatever you want to think about OSU.
 
Nope, National Championships are all that counts.

UC 2-0 vs Ohio State in the only 2 games that mattered.

UC 2 National Championships, OSU 1.

Comeback when OSU wins another one to move into a tie with UC.

Just to play devil's advocate:

What about NIT championships back when the NIT was the premier tournament? Do those count?

Should championships in a day and age where there was no 3 point line, no shot clock, much fewer teams, ineligible teams, a rival tournament, and freshman not playing count the same as a championship today?
 
Back
Top