Big 12

[2bearcatdad]

no, i will not show respect with regard to their religion.

if it makes you more comfortable, though, you can be happy in knowing that my thoughts are in no way specific to that particular brand of religion.

And you accuse them of intolerance and hate speech.

Good post Red_N_Black. You offered a compromised voice of reason. Too bad some people don't get it.

 

[Madman81]

And you accuse them of intolerance and hate speech.

Good post Red_N_Black. You offered a compromised voice of reason. Too bad some people don't get it.

i did? where was that?

any accusations by me would certainly focus on stupidity first and foremost.

nonsense is nonsense no matter the package.

 

[Bearcats1232002]

And you accuse them of intolerance and hate speech.

Liberals are tolerant as long as you agree with them and hate the people they hate especially any kind of religion.

 

[jacobkdoyle]

Can we not do the politics stuff? This is a UC board and Big 12 thread. I get the relation to BYU, but we don't need to veer off into a political war in here.

 

[GarradJ21]

Can we not do the politics stuff? This is a UC board and Big 12 thread. I get the relation to BYU, but we don't need to veer off into a political war in here.

Agreed. Lets move on.

LT you said we would have something by Monday...It's Wednesday.

 

[Bearcats1232002]

I wish they would announce this quickly!!! The suspense is killing me.

 

[L-T]

Agreed. Lets move on.

LT you said we would have something by Monday...It's Wednesday.

I guess my source sucks.

 

[WAITE HOYT 2]

I guess my source sucks.

I hope not. I'll forgive him if his timing was off and we get in.

 

[jacobkdoyle]

I was under the impression that August 14th meant something? Or the 12th maybe? Did I read that here? It's all blending together but hopefully we hear something soon.

 

[JasonS]

I was under the impression that August 14th meant something? Or the 12th maybe? Did I read that here? It's all blending together but hopefully we hear something soon.

I had heard the 14th but the LGBT thing with BYU might stretch this out a bit. No inside knowledge but just my guess.

 

[NKY Bearcat]

It is my understanding that Oklahoma had been pushing to get it done sooner (12 to 14th) to capitalize on expansion momentum.

I agree with JasonS, and would think BYU's LGBT issue has resulted in the timeline being stretched out. So my guess would be the late next week there is an announcement.

 

[JasonS]

It is my understanding that Oklahoma had been pushing to get it done sooner (12 to 14th) to capitalize on expansion momentum.

I agree with JasonS, and would think BYU's LGBT issue has resulted in the timeline being stretched out. So my guess would be the late next week there is an announcement.

I think they want to get this done before the season starts if at all possible but I don't know how realistic that is anymore.

 

[GarradJ21]

Not feeling so confident now...http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...er-bob-bowlsby-interview-17-schools-expansion

 

[Bearcat_NTS]

Not feeling so confident now...http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...er-bob-bowlsby-interview-17-schools-expansion

From that article:
The most likely scenario is that the Big 12 will stay at 10 teams or only add two schools for a 12-team league with two six-team divisions, sources said.

Now will Jason apologize to me or not?

 

[JasonS]

From that article:
The most likely scenario is that the Big 12 will stay at 10 teams or only add two schools for a 12-team league with two six-team divisions, sources said.

Now will Jason apologize to me or not?

What is there to apologize for? This comes from Brett McMurphy who hasn't been right on anything yet. And even if they go with 2 teams, UC will be one of the 2. I have said all along, the only way UC does not get in is if the Big 12 elects not to expand. That has always, and still is, a possibility, though I think it is a smaller one. Unlike you, I have no issues putting my stance out there without percentages that gives me an out if I'm wrong.

I'll apologize to you when you stop attacking coaches, players and the program in general on this site.

 

[NKY Bearcat]

What is there to apologize for? This comes from Brett McMurphy who hasn't been right on anything yet. And even if they go with 2 teams, UC will be one of the 2. I have said all along, the only way UC does not get in is if the Big 12 elects not to expand. That has always, and still is, a possibility, though I think it is a smaller one. Unlike you, I have no issues putting my stance out there without percentages that gives me an out if I'm wrong.

I'll apologize to you when you stop attacking coaches, players and the program in general on this site.

I would say the odds are 5% NTS actually contributes, 25% he ignores your response, and 70% he trolls.

I don't think I can be wrong!

 

[L-T]

I would say the odds are 5% NTS actually contributes, 25% he ignores your response, and 70% he trolls.

I don't think I can be wrong!

Wow....already trash talking long time posters on your 2nd post on this site. Impressive.

 

[Red_N_Black_Attack]

Announcement can't come soon enough! Whether it's no expansion, 12, 14, with or without UC... I just want this announced to end speculation.

 

[#BearcatNation]

Wow....already trash talking long time posters on your 2nd post on this site. Impressive.

Don't do that. His opinion is worth just as much as yours and mine. For all we knew, he could've been a long-time lurker that knows a lot about us.

 

[L-T]

Don't do that. His opinion is worth just as much as yours and mine. For all we knew, he could've been a long-time lurker that knows a lot about us.

His opinion on Bearcat Football and Basketball is as valuable as yours and mine. His opinion of NTS is worthless and and violates a number of rules on here. He didn't say a single thing about anything related to Bearcat Basketball or Football in that post, so you shouldn't be standing up for him. NTS has many positive posts about this program, and he has his share of negative posts too. He says what is on his mind. Nothing wrong with that. This forum is not called Bearcatpositivetalk. It's called Bearcattalk. I would assume that would include discussion of both the good and the bad.