Michigan Game Postponed

Bearcat_NTS · Jul 27, 2016

@JonRothstein
Cincinnati's scheduled game with Michigan was postponed due to issues with final exam schedules, source told @CBSSports. Makeup date is TBD.

Mediocre Mick probably schedules directional U and gets another win. Unbelievable.

GarradJ21 · Jul 27, 2016

This is a shame. Mich rescheduling with South Carolina. Hopefully we will get a good opponent in here.

#BearcatNation · Jul 27, 2016

Bearcat_NTS said:
@JonRothstein
Cincinnati's scheduled game with Michigan was postponed due to issues with final exam schedules, source told @CBSSports. Makeup date is TBD.

Mediocre Mick probably schedules directional U and gets another win. Unbelievable.

Spot-on analysis, as always.

M64W · Jul 27, 2016

Bearcat_NTS said:
@JonRothstein
Cincinnati's scheduled game with Michigan was postponed due to issues with final exam schedules, source told @CBSSports. Makeup date is TBD.

Mediocre Mick probably schedules directional U and gets another win. Unbelievable.

You are the most negative poster I have ever witnessed. It doesn't matter the subject, but we can count on you to deliver the negative viewpoint.

UCalum08 · Jul 27, 2016

M64W said:
You are the most negative poster I have ever witnessed. It doesn't matter the subject, but we can count on you to deliver the negative viewpoint.

Permanent rain cloud. About the match up, this does suck. I hope that it does indeed get rescheduled but it seems like it might not happen.

Chad Brendel · Jul 27, 2016

Michigan agreed upon the date and signed the deal then backed out because of a "conflict with finals". This after two years of not answering the phone when called to schedule the series...

Bearcat_NTS · Jul 27, 2016

So Michigan has no problem playing Xavier but doesn't want to play us? What's the deal?

justinhub2003 · Jul 27, 2016

Bearcat_NTS said:
So Michigan has no problem playing Xavier but doesn't want to play us? What's the deal?

Dude playing X was not their choice . It was a gavitt game,

You can root for Xavier if you want man and spread your positivity in their forums

UCalum08 · Jul 27, 2016

Chad Brendel said:
Michigan agreed upon the date and signed the deal then backed out because of a "conflict with finals". This after two years of not answering the phone when called to schedule the series...

So basically Michigan is pulling an O$U? With your knowledge, why would they back out after signing?

L-T · Jul 28, 2016

Bearcat_NTS said:
@JonRothstein
Cincinnati's scheduled game with Michigan was postponed due to issues with final exam schedules, source told @CBSSports. Makeup date is TBD.

Mediocre Mick probably schedules directional U and gets another win. Unbelievable.

Another step towards reaching that coveted goal of getting ranked in the top 68 and snatching that 7th straight trip to the NCAA. One less loss and one additional win. As long as we can get to our usual 4th or 5th place in the AAC, our chances look good. I wonder which 1 or 2 seed we'll get to play early this year?

#BearcatNation · Jul 28, 2016

L-T said:
Another step towards reaching that coveted goal of getting ranked in the top 68 and snatching that 7th straight trip to the NCAA. One less loss and one additional win. As long as we can get to our usual 4th or 5th place in the AAC, our chances look good. I wonder which 1 or 2 seed we'll get to play early this year?

In the 3 years in the AAC, we've finished 1st, 3rd, and 3rd, holding a 40-14 record (.714) during in-conference games. I'm sure you'll interpret all this as me being "just fine with how UC has done", but I'm merely pointing out that you're flat-out wrong. At least correctly back up your negativity.

jacobkdoyle · Jul 28, 2016

#BearcatNation said:
In the 3 years in the AAC, we've finished 1st, 3rd, and 3rd, holding a 40-14 record (.714) during in-conference games. I'm sure you'll interpret all this as me being "just fine with how UC has done", but I'm merely pointing out that you're flat-out wrong. At least correctly back up your negativity.

I'm pretty sure we would've been the #5 seed in the AAC Tournament last year if SMU was eligible for the postseason.

GarradJ21 · Jul 28, 2016

I try and stay positive but its getting very hard to. The season needs to start and it needs to be a good year. An exceptional year, or I have about had it.

#BearcatNation · Jul 28, 2016

jacobkdoyle said:
I'm pretty sure we would've been the #5 seed in the AAC Tournament last year if SMU was eligible for the postseason.

Still finished T-3rd. We have never finished "4th or 5th". Just found that funny.

L-T · Jul 28, 2016

#BearcatNation said:
In the 3 years in the AAC, we've finished 1st, 3rd, and 3rd, holding a 40-14 record (.714) during in-conference games. I'm sure you'll interpret all this as me being "just fine with how UC has done", but I'm merely pointing out that you're flat-out wrong. At least correctly back up your negativity.

http://theamerican.org/allstandings.aspx

Somehow, the AAC website shows us in 5th place, but I guess that was just by coincidence. If you have a better source than the actual conference standings, then produce them, or I guess you are the one who is flat-out wrong.

L-T · Jul 28, 2016

#BearcatNation said:
Still finished T-3rd. We have never finished "4th or 5th". Just found that funny.

If you were going to get the 5th seed, then that means you finished 5th, regardless of what the wins and losses say.

#BearcatNation · Jul 28, 2016

L-T said:
http://theamerican.org/allstandings.aspx

Somehow, the AAC website shows us in 5th place, but I guess that was just by coincidence. If you have a better source than the actual conference standings, then produce them, or I guess you are the one who is flat-out wrong.

3 teams finished 12-6, making them all tied for 3rd. Remember when we were "conference champs" in football in 2011, 2012, and 2014? We were tied for 1st all 3 years. Still called co-champs. Hate that this is even an argument right now...

L-T · Jul 28, 2016

#BearcatNation said:
3 teams finished 12-6, making them all tied for 3rd. Remember when we were "conference champs" in football in 2011, 2012, and 2014? We were tied for 1st all 3 years. Still called co-champs. Hate that this is even an argument right now...

There's always tiebreakers to determine who "the" winner is, who gets the top seed, etc. I know, it is so "feel-good" to be called co-champs. It's sad that some of our fans are even feeling somewhat good and will argue that tri-third sounds so much better than 5th. You do realize though that tied for third is also tied for 4th and tied for 5th don't you?

#BearcatNation · Jul 28, 2016

L-T said:
There's always tiebreakers to determine who "the" winner is, who gets the top seed, etc. I know, it is so "feel-good" to be called co-champs. It's sad that some of our fans are even feeling somewhat good and will argue that tri-third sounds so much better than 5th. You do realize though that tied for third is also tied for 4th and tied for 5th don't you?

It's also sad that some fans will say we "always finish 4th or 5th in the conference" when that's simply not true. It's literally all I was pointing out, and of course you interpret that as I'm trying to make it better than it is, which is exactly what I originally stated you'd do. Your attitude is beyond predictable. It's too bad the block feature on here isn't better. Conversation over on my end.

kskenyon4 · Jul 28, 2016

Cincy finished T-3 last year in the AAC. Not 3rd, not 4th, not 5th. Any person with rudimentary knowledge of sports knows that.

Never has Cincy been 4/5 in the AAC.

Michigan Game Postponed

Help Support BearcatTalk:

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Senior Moderator

Similar threads