Rivalries in Big East

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

swg

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
7,155
Location
Ohio
We've talked about a lot of these series before, and I think they're worth mentioning again because some of them make too much sense not to happen. Here's my list:

1. Pitt-Penn State: Feldman listed this as his No. 4 rivalry, and rightly so. The two Pennsylvania schools have not played since 2000 with no current plans to meet in the future. It's a travesty, really. Perhaps Pitt joining the Big Ten will finally get this series to resume, but it shouldn't have to come to that.

2. West Virginia-Virginia Tech: These two last met in 2005, and the former Big East rivals should be playing regularly given their proximity and shared success. For that matter, it would be good to see West Virginia play Virginia, which hasn't happened since 2002.

3. UConn-Boston College: Ill will from BC's move to the ACC has kept this natural rivalry from continuing. It will probably take new administrations on both sides -- or some sort of conference merger that reunites the two -- to get it going again. Northeast football is worse off with these two avoiding each other.

4. Cincinnati-Ohio State: This series is set to resume in 2014 following an eight-year hiatus. It would be great to see these two Buckeye State schools plays for bragging rights every year, especially if the Bearcats maintain their current level of performance. But it's unlikely that Ohio State would agree to a yearly series.

5. Louisville-Indiana: Hard to believe these schools have played only twice, and not since 1986. The Cardinals have long wanted to start a series with the Hoosiers, who have shown no interest in it. It's silly that Louisville is playing a nonconference game against Oregon State but can't get an agreement with the flagship university of the state that sits just across the Ohio River.

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigeast/post/_/id/9698/rivalries-wed-like-to-see-in-the-big-east
 
I have a feeling that these next two games against OSU may be the last games against OSU for many, many years. OSU definitely feels a bit threatened by UC right now. The "world" would end if OSU loses to UC.
 
I would add a few for UC:

UC v. Notre Dame
UC v. Kentucky
UC v. Michigan State (as long as Dantonio is there)

The UC/Notre Dame game would have always been huge due to the large catholic presence in the city. Now that BK bailed on UC to go to ND, the rivalry would be even more intense.

UC/UK would be interesting as well. UK is no OSU, but an annual tilt would help UC. If UC were able to compete and beat UK on an annual basis, alot of the Bluenecks would switch their allegiance to the Red and Black, IMHO.

UC/Michigan State would be great if only to show Coach Dantonio UC can aspire to be more than just a mid-major program. I imagine if the Spartans traveled to Clifton, Dantonio would coach his first sell out game at the Nipp.


Jason S:- If UC picks up where in left off in the next few years we might now ever play OSU again except for a bowl game. OSU only scheduled UC like it has as Jim T. made a commitment to play in state schools. OSU has scheduled YSU, Akron, Kent, Toledo, etc. because they knew they would be cupcakes. They assumed UC would be as well. Even if they still played UC at the same clip, 8 years from 2014 would be 2022. That is a long way off.
 
I would add a few for UC:

UC v. Notre Dame
UC v. Kentucky
UC v. Michigan State (as long as Dantonio is there)

The UC/Notre Dame game would have always been huge due to the large catholic presence in the city. Now that BK bailed on UC to go to ND, the rivalry would be even more intense.

UC/UK would be interesting as well. UK is no OSU, but an annual tilt would help UC. If UC were able to compete and beat UK on an annual basis, alot of the Bluenecks would switch their allegiance to the Red and Black, IMHO.

UC/Michigan State would be great if only to show Coach Dantonio UC can aspire to be more than just a mid-major program. I imagine if the Spartans traveled to Clifton, Dantonio would coach his first sell out game at the Nipp.


Jason S:- If UC picks up where in left off in the next few years we might now ever play OSU again except for a bowl game. OSU only scheduled UC like it has as Jim T. made a commitment to play in state schools. OSU has scheduled YSU, Akron, Kent, Toledo, etc. because they knew they would be cupcakes. They assumed UC would be as well. Even if they still played UC at the same clip, 8 years from 2014 would be 2022. That is a long way off.

I think 2014 is it as long as Tressell is the coach. His in-state recruiting is getting a lot tougher with Kelly at ND and UC a viable option. While they are still landing a big majority of in-state talents, a loss or 2 to UC could really threaten that. I don't think that UC will ever out-recruit OSU in Ohio but I really think UC could start to win some key battles over the next few years.
 
I would add a few for UC:

UC v. Notre Dame
UC v. Kentucky
UC v. Michigan State (as long as Dantonio is there)

The UC/Notre Dame game would have always been huge due to the large catholic presence in the city. Now that BK bailed on UC to go to ND, the rivalry would be even more intense.

UC/UK would be interesting as well. UK is no OSU, but an annual tilt would help UC. If UC were able to compete and beat UK on an annual basis, alot of the Bluenecks would switch their allegiance to the Red and Black, IMHO.

UC/Michigan State would be great if only to show Coach Dantonio UC can aspire to be more than just a mid-major program. I imagine if the Spartans traveled to Clifton, Dantonio would coach his first sell out game at the Nipp.


Jason S:- If UC picks up where in left off in the next few years we might now ever play OSU again except for a bowl game. OSU only scheduled UC like it has as Jim T. made a commitment to play in state schools. OSU has scheduled YSU, Akron, Kent, Toledo, etc. because they knew they would be cupcakes. They assumed UC would be as well. Even if they still played UC at the same clip, 8 years from 2014 would be 2022. That is a long way off.


UC-Kentucky would make sense to me, although the fact that they already play a Big East team every year (Louisville) would make it unlikely. UC-Notre Dame/Michigan St only is intriguing because of the coaches and only intriguing on our side of the fence. That isn't a reason to schedule a rivalry. Rivalries need to make sense on both sides. I don't want to play Central Michigan every year because we took their coach. UC-Notre Dame at PBS every now and again could make sense for ND just to keep up with their established fan-base here, but they'd probably be better off playing someone other than us in that game so they could get more share of the money by making it a "home" game. Plus honestly, I don't think they're in danger of losing any of their fan base locally, they probably gained some by hiring Kelly. You know how our Bearcat bandwagon fans like to follow the coach before the program.
 
Unlike the Huggins situation, I don't know of any UC Football fans who are now following ND because Kelly is there. First, you are discussing apples to oranges in the way each coach left. Second, I think it is unfair to paint UC Football fans with that kind of a brush. People are behind this program. Look at season ticket sales and it will tell you everything you need to know.
 
Unlike the Huggins situation, I don't know of any UC Football fans who are now following ND because Kelly is there. First, you are discussing apples to oranges in the way each coach left. Second, I think it is unfair to paint UC Football fans with that kind of a brush. People are behind this program. Look at season ticket sales and it will tell you everything you need to know.

Yeah I think the people in Cincinnati who are supporting Kelly at ND were
a) already ND fans
b) UC haters to begin with and were hoping Kelly's departure would mean UC's demise.

I know for a fact Kelly did anger some people locally with the way he left. I am not just talking about regular Joe Bloe's either, I am referring to high school football coaches and the like.

Regarding the rivalry games being beneficial to UC only; I understand that. I still think it would make for a heck of a game. Can you image the atmosphere of a UC/ND match up down at PBS? The game would sell out in two seconds and we'd have a tailgate party like you wouldn't believe.
 
Unlike the Huggins situation, I don't know of any UC Football fans who are now following ND because Kelly is there. First, you are discussing apples to oranges in the way each coach left. Second, I think it is unfair to paint UC Football fans with that kind of a brush. People are behind this program. Look at season ticket sales and it will tell you everything you need to know.


We haven't started losing yet. Hopefully we don't miss a beat and keep winning. I agree the situations are different and Kelly rubbed plenty of people the wrong way by leaving. I'm really not trying to be negative here. And I wasn't trying to say we lost fans, but ND probably gained some fans. Lets not pretend either that alot of our fans that recently jumped on board were probably big basketball fans 10 years ago. I have six season tickets and the friends that have two of them texted me within minutes of Kelly leaving that they might not be down to renew with me this year.
 
That is disappointing to hear about your friends. It sounds like they are still invested which is a good thing. I am part of a group of 7 season ticket holders and our group is actually expanding to 10 this year. No one in our group even considered walking away.

ND has always been a hot and cold topic. You either loved them or hated them. I don't think that has changed. Personally, I hate ND. Always have. I don't hate them any more or less because of Kelly but that's just me.
 
That is disappointing to hear about your friends. It sounds like they are still invested which is a good thing. I am part of a group of 7 season ticket holders and our group is actually expanding to 10 this year. No one in our group even considered walking away.

ND has always been a hot and cold topic. You either loved them or hated them. I don't think that has changed. Personally, I hate ND. Always have. I don't hate them any more or less because of Kelly but that's just me.

I feel the same way about ND. My friends did end up renewing again. I will say I am pleased the way fans have stuck with the program thus far. Especially the turnout in NO. Obviously any program that quits winning loses their sex appeal to the casual fan, I'm just scared to guess what percentage of our new fans are casual fans and how many will be in it for the long haul. Lets hope we don't have to find out anytime soon.
 
Back
Top