This is like trying to change the mind of a Democrat, or Republican for that matter. If you have ever coached football at a high level, which I doubt many of you have, one has to delegate responsibility to their assistants. I think many of you believe that a head college coach should be running around yelling and screaming, changing the play calls, getting red in the face (aka Butch Jones) etc.
Let me see---UC lost to undefeated Temple who beat Penn State, lost to undefeated Memphis who just beat Ole Miss, and lost to BYU (5-2) who beat Nebraska, Boise St. and lost by one point to UCLA.
UC yearns to be like WVU, Louisville, Syracuse, and Rutgers (all teams who left for Power 5 conferences)---WVU is 3-3, Louisville is 2-4, Syracuse is 3-3, and Rutgers is 3-3.
Some of you think if we could just hire Charlie Strong we would be undefeated (oh yea, Texas is 2-4) or bring back Butch Jones (well they are 3-3). Coaching is not an easy profession, to say the least!
Before the game tilted towards BYU, Mike Boone was finding space and making players miss. TT abandoned the run as soon as he felt a threat coming from the other team.
After BYU controlled all momentum, Mike Boone wasn't on the field the last two drives which were critical. Instead Tion Green was on the field and missed several blocking assignments. Green has been inconsistent all season in pass protection but was on the field in a pass heavy situation and when running was still an option. Why?
While the game was still in reach, on top of the poor decision making, TT flat out gave up with 5 minutes left. A coach gives up on his players? What players won't give up on him? What players will want to play for him? Any that we actually want?
So he barely recognizes his best players; rarely puts them in the right situation; and he signals defeat before the game is over (look at the MSUvUM game). In-game decision making is not all that coaching is, fine. But it says a lot about his ability to lead this team in the future.