cincrulz11
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
- Messages
- 4,329
Yeah I'd skip the questions I asked you too.
How is he going to spin this? Or will he start kicking and screaming? He may also ignore this? Let’s see
3 times in 9 years.
Harvard
Iowa last year
Nevada
Everything other than that went as expected
I mean we have no idea what kinda long term recruiter John Brannen is going to be.
His first big swing and miss was on a publicized courting of Pettway from Alabama.
That would have gotten me excited to land him. But right now, Brannen has a very mid major staff and its not like were lighting the roof on fire with recruiting.
In 2 classes we still have just 1 top 100 player
Tari Eason fell out of the top 100 in both the composite and the 247 rankings. Why he went from solidly in the top 100 to out of it, I have no idea.
I don't think you can look at CJB's recruiting and think its been amazing or anything.
Mick underachieved 3/9 times
Overachieved 1/9 times
Performed to expectation 5/9 times
Not great but not dreadful. The only thing is, the Nevada meltdown is indefensible. And that will taint his legacy for me.
yeah you have to. because his teams have had talented players on them at key positions.
ill start with the past, you tell me the future.
Caupain
Cobb
Ellis
Clark
Washington
Evans
Jenifer
Broome
Cumberland
Every single one of them was productive from day one (Ellis after returning). Now give me who we have for next year and the year after. Keith could go on that list. Now give me anybody else. Cumberland is the tail end of that core. Nothing came behind it.
Moore, Nsoseme, Fredericks were all whiffs. LJ looks like a whiff. Hardnett we can give a maybe at best. theres nobody else.
Curtis
Keith
Moore
Diarra
?????
thats the lineup next year? let me know who im missing.
I had to read the rest of the post in an Eric Cartman voice.What worked for him didn't always work for other Schoo
Brannen has two of the top 15 all time recruits, by 247, in his short tenure here.
I'll certainly take Mick Cronin's last 9 years of tourney success over the last 9 years of Huggins.
In fact, I think the big reason people were frustrated with Mick, was because it was a continuation of Huggins failures in the latter part of his time at UC.
Huggs just happened to buy himself a lot of Capital with success he had in his first 5-6 years.
Huggins was getting top 4 seeds and still had just 1 sweet 16 in his last 9 years.
He was upset 7 TIMES in his last 9 years.
Maybe UC basketball is cursed. 18 tourney's between 2 coaches and just 2 sweet 16's. 10 times being upset by lowered seeded teams.
I had to read the rest of the post in an Eric Cartman voice.
WOW is all I have to say if you would take Mick over Bob Huggins. WOW
Justin can you just get some UCLA gear and join their board?
You buying?
I think we could get a pool or a go fund me together and make this happen.
YES.
If we split Huggins Career in half, I absolutely would. He also peaked at Cincinnati and needed to move on.
His first half of his career was great.
The 2nd half, Was Whiff after whiff after whiff while also bringing in questionable characters to UC.
7 upsets in 9 years is indefensible.
But go on and tell me how bad Nevada burns when you can just pull up wikipedia and relive every single high seed upset bob Huggins had
but he did like, ya know, make a final 4, and some elite 8s, and like, stuff.
and it was time for him to move on. even without the drunk driving, certain sections of the fan base were growing tired of his last 9 years. and thats even with final 4 and elite 8s.