Wichita State

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

What will be the outcome of the Wichita State game?

  • UC wins by 10+

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • UC wins by 7-9

    Votes: 9 31.0%
  • UC wins by 4-6

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • UC wins by 1-3

    Votes: 3 10.3%
  • Wichita State wins

    Votes: 7 24.1%

  • Total voters
    29
don't have to apologize. was honestly wondering. the problem is other teams in the tournament will have good players also, that also play well together. In many cases better than our players. I am not giving up on the season, but it is looking less and less likely with every good team we play, that we will accomplish the things people thought this team could

Cincinnati fans... gotta love em.
 
Rough game, really thought this one we would win. Gonna hurt our seeding for sure, and @ Wichita is looking like a must win now. That being say we are still very good, we still have a great chance to make a run in this tourney. I can't even be on Facebook right now, Cincinnati fans really are a joke sometimes. Acting like we aren't even gonna win in the first round now, it really is pathetic and sad that is what our fan base is.

That is putting a ton of pressure on a game at Wichita that is senior night for seven players.

Would say ceiling is a 4 seed, most likely a 5-6
 
And the fact that it only takes 1 time seeing them to know as well. It’s not even a close competition

No more bs. Time to show we aren't going out like this. Shake it up. Time to go with Broome full time. Period. If Jenifer starts next game, I'm just going to assume we'll share the conference title at best, not win the AAC Tournament, and lose in the 2nd round. It's so unbelievably obvious in our biggest games. And there are a bunch the rest of the way.
 
Cincinnati fans... gotta love em.

what did I say that you disagreed with? Are you saying we have looked good against good teams? Are you going to continue to say everything is fine, every time we lose to a good team. Stay strong man. do you
 
I don't see Brooks starting over Washington
I don't see Scott starting over Clark
I don't see Williams and Moore starting over Cumberland and Evans

Enough. It's just stubbornness at this point. And that's such a stupid reason to be a worse team. Put Broome in with the best players.
 
No more bs. Time to show we aren't going out like this. Shake it up. Time to go with Broome full time. Period. If Jenifer starts next game, I'm just going to assume we'll share the conference title at best, not win the AAC Tournament, and lose in the 2nd round. It's so unbelievably obvious in our biggest games. And there are a bunch the rest of the way.

I hope this happens but seriously doubt it watching Cronin for 12 years. He started JJ second half and even took Broome out for Jenifer on the last play, where it didnt even matter b/c was homerun ball. Who would score on the bench?

The way I see it would almost have to replace two starters like he has been doing with Broome and Brooks 3 minutes into every game subbing for KJ and KW. That would mean sitting Kyle and Cronin wont do that.
 
I don't understand the "we need bench scoring" ideal. Every team out there starts the best players. Then you sub some back ups and leave some starters in. Then sub remaining starters and put original starters back in. Something similar. no real reason to not be starting Broome. Jenifer in, is really not much different than having jarron or jake running point.

But you know, toughness, and stuff. That's why we lost.
 
what did I say that you disagreed with? Are you saying we have looked good against good teams? Are you going to continue to say everything is fine, every time we lose to a good team. Stay strong man. do you

I am certainly going to continue to think we are a very good team, capable of making a final four run. UCLA is a pretty good team, we dominated them on their home court. We've dominated a lot of pretty good teams this year. Of course I'm pissed we lost today, of course it's frustrating. But I'm not going to flip a swig and dog everything I've talked up all year because we lost two in a row. Is Purdue not capable of making a run? Or Duke ? Or UNC? Or just about anyone, because almost every team has dropped two in a row this year, or at the very least lost a game or two that definitely shouldn't have. So no the house isn't in fire, and I'm not gonna run around like all of you as if it is.
 
I am certainly going to continue to think we are a very good team, capable of making a final four run. UCLA is a pretty good team, we dominated them on their home court. We've dominated a lot of pretty good teams this year. Of course I'm pissed we lost today, of course it's frustrating. But I'm not going to flip a swig and dog everything I've talked up all year because we lost two in a row. Is Purdue not capable of making a run? Or Duke ? Or UNC? Or just about anyone, because almost every team has dropped two in a row this year, or at the very least lost a game or two that definitely shouldn't have. So no the house isn't in fire, and I'm not gonna run around like all of you as if it is.
You are still on the UCLA thing? Have you check them out lately. Seen this morning they are the first 4 out and you’re still on this? Ok
 
I am certainly going to continue to think we are a very good team, capable of making a final four run. UCLA is a pretty good team, we dominated them on their home court. We've dominated a lot of pretty good teams this year. Of course I'm pissed we lost today, of course it's frustrating. But I'm not going to flip a swig and dog everything I've talked up all year because we lost two in a row. Is Purdue not capable of making a run? Or Duke ? Or UNC? Or just about anyone, because almost every team has dropped two in a row this year, or at the very least lost a game or two that definitely shouldn't have. So no the house isn't in fire, and I'm not gonna run around like all of you as if it is.

You are right, it is statistically possible for any team to make a run. You nailed that. So, no matter how they play, you will continue to say they are really good? Why even play the games?

What tournament teams have we dominated?
 
I don't understand the "we need bench scoring" ideal. Every team out there starts the best players. Then you sub some back ups and leave some starters in.

its just something people said cause what else can you say?



not going with broome from the start of the season is killing us now, as many predicted and worried it would. its a shame, it really is. this team has so much potential, but its looking like it will not reach that full potential unless this game forces a change.



and its not cause broome is a super star, he did play fantastic today, but its because jenifer is simply not a starting PG at this level. he gives you nothing on either end against this type of opponent. 2 games in a row guys blow by him on defense and he's never brought much to the table of offense.


2 losses that were avoidable if broome was the starter from day 1 (no guarantee they win either of course, but playing the best players tends to help).
 
I was depressed about the game so I went and got 2 orders of nacho fries and a baha blast slush. Now I feel worse.
 
I was depressed about the game so I went and got 2 orders of nacho fries and a baha blast slush. Now I feel worse.

the potential for the team is still there. mick needs to trust his guys and let them do it. he says it all the time, players win games. well, let them win them.
 
Back
Top