JackBauer151
Well-known member
I think Rasean Davis if he visits this weekend.
That ended as soon as UC got Clark. Would be shocked if he still visits.
I think Rasean Davis if he visits this weekend.
Hopefully a JUCO isn't a project, if he is he isn't worth a scholarship.
Funny UC supposedly stopped recruiting him. Seems like UC hasn't lost a recruiting battle in a while, they just back off the recruits. I'm guessing his mind was already made up which is why UC backed off, if in fact they really did.
I was actually surprised to hear people thinking we would still possibly land Grantham after we got Clark and Moore. Why? We will have up to 5 players IMO who can (depending on how big we want to play and who we need to keep on the court) play the 3 after this year. Thomas, Clark, Lawrence, Mormon, and Sanders. We will have at least 3 players who can play the 4...Moore, Clark, and Lawrence.
Why would we want to add more players to a position of strength when we have question marks at other positions? Grantham stopped making sense to me as soon as we got Clark and Moore.
Both Jeff and Brendel both stated that getting Clark and Moore had nothing to do with Grantham's status.
Just seems odd that we have a chance to get a top 50 guard and a top 75 SF and we quit recruiting both at last minute.
Both Jeff and Brendel both stated that getting Clark and Moore had nothing to do with Grantham's status.
Just seems odd that we have a chance to get a top 50 guard and a top 75 SF and we quit recruiting both at last minute.
I'm guessing that it just means they were told by the kid they weren't coming to UC so UC was quick to say they "stopped" recruiting him to save face. I'm sure it happens in other programs as well. Personally, I would much rather it be this way then keep trying until the very end and have to listen to the fanbase go on and on about how "Michigan paid him they are cheaters" and my favorite "I'm glad we didn't give in and stoop to there level we have more class."
Jared Terrell I know the reason behind. It all lined up. Morman gets eligible, he cancels his visit, chooses another school. With Grantham something doesnt quite add up. Fills another front court interchangeable player which UC cant get enough of. Recruited him for a long time. Got him on campus. Visit supposedly went very well from sources at UC and even Gary Clark commenting on it. Michigan visit supposedly not a homerun. All of that and we suddenly stop recruiting him. This one I dont buy. Something else is at play here. No idea what and I dont want to speculate but it seems like someone outside the Grantham family might have a hand in this.
Brendel made it very clear that UC cancelled his visit, not the other way around.
Sorry, that's what I meant. Adds up even more with that correction. Donte's situation Im having trouble understanding why UC would abruptly end it's recruitment of him. Maybe, as it was stated above, that Grantham simply told UC it was not going to be them. Personally, I dont think that was it.
If we stopped contacting Grantham after we signed the other two forwards it would make perfect sense to me.
If we were still actively recruiting him after the commits then I would say we just lost out to UM.
I would guess somebody knows if we were still trying with Grantham...and it doesn't sounds like we were.
But see that's what doesnt add up to me. If they were going to stop recruiting Clark or Grantham if the other one committed why would they cancel the Terrell visit? They dont need another guard and the front court could still use another hybrid 3\4 with Lawrence probably out the door in the next two years. The dynamic between all of that seems weird to me. I just dont believe UC called it quits because of Clark. I also dont believe that based off all the information that was out there on the UC\UM visits that he just told the coaches he was going to UM. I think something else happened in between the time he got back and UC backed off. I am in no way accusing UM of anything improper. Easy to see why a kid would choose UM over UC. Just thought it was going down to the wire and all of the sudden there was this drastic shift. Probably way off on this one but just has a weird feel to me.
Maybe it will be like Moore...wasn't it said that we backed off him and then all the crystal ball people switched to Seton Hall before he committed here? Now granted Chad is about a reliable of a source as you can get on this information, but I seem to remember seeing that we were out of the picture for Moore as well and that we were backing off.
But see that's what doesnt add up to me. If they were going to stop recruiting Clark or Grantham if the other one committed why would they cancel the Terrell visit? They dont need another guard and the front court could still use another hybrid 3\4 with Lawrence probably out the door in the next two years. The dynamic between all of that seems weird to me. I just dont believe UC called it quits because of Clark. I also dont believe that based off all the information that was out there on the UC\UM visits that he just told the coaches he was going to UM. I think something else happened in between the time he got back and UC backed off. I am in no way accusing UM of anything improper. Easy to see why a kid would choose UM over UC. Just thought it was going down to the wire and all of the sudden there was this drastic shift. Probably way off on this one but just has a weird feel to me.
Maybe it will be like Moore...wasn't it said that we backed off him and then all the crystal ball people switched to Seton Hall before he committed here? Now granted Chad is about a reliable of a source as you can get on this information, but I seem to remember seeing that we were out of the picture for Moore as well and that we were backing off.
Yes those things happen. They didn't happen here but they do happen...Is it even possible that Clark told Cronin he would commit if we backed off Grantham or pulled the offer? I am guessing things like this happen? Or maybe coach says "it's either you or him...whoever commits first"?