User Name:
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Messages
- 324
I vote for sooner rather than later.
This conference realignment stuff is funny. You go from hoping for no realignment, to hoping for more.
Lol. When you are in UC, USF, or UConn's position, you take anything you can get related to the ACC or Big 12 at this point. But we need the dominoes to start falling.
Now the Michigan AD is hinting at the B1G expansion:
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/76573/more-expansion-looms-over-ad-decisions
“Based on the last three years I’ve been in this business, you’d be crazy not to think about it," Michigan athletic director Dave Brandon said. "But it’s hard to model anything because you don’t know what to model. The minute you get yourself convinced that you’re going to go from 14 to 16, for all you know you’re going to 18, and a lot of people think the ultimate landing place is 20. Who knows?"
Iowa AD:
ou make your decision based on today," Iowa's Gary Barta said. "And today, we have that many teams. We can’t worry about something that’s not established yet. I don’t know if and when there will be more teams. Right now, we’re going to make decisions based on the additions of Rutgers and Maryland, and we’re going to make them with the information we have, consistent with our principles."
Northwestern AD:
"It’s hard to predict the future," added Northwestern's Jim Phillips. "No one would have predicted we’d be at this place we’re at right now. I don’t think you can get polarized by the what-ifs or the potential of what might be and lose sight of where you’re at."
Last edited: