Depth chart

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

Yeah I agree with you on Brannen seems to prefer lighting fast PGs running team. Watching Harvey highlights against best of best competition he looks to have excellent ball control and handles something coach also seems to be one of his main priorities in a recruit. Harvey mentioned a lot about running team and being playmaker setting up teammates. He's a PG at next level if he wants play in NBA, I see brannen unlike mick setting up his players for Pro after college and not just role models that work at car dealerships. With pro system we have now I see more of our players going pro even couple lottery picks.

Mick has 4 guys in the NBA, the highest ranking was Clark at 100. He developed players just fine
 
Mick has 4 guys in the NBA, the highest ranking was Clark at 100. He developed players just fine
well Lance was top 15 , Caupain had to further develop for 2 years to play in 4 games last year. Lance is the only one of them four to date that has lasted and contributed on a nightly basis for a whole season or more. SK also had a couple quality NBA seasons. No other players played any NBA games.
 
Torvik says (no Prince or Davenport):

Jarron - 32
Scott - 31
Jaevin - 27
Williams - 26
McNeal - 25
Harvey - 21
Moore - 15
MAW - 12
Sorolla - 7
Diarra - 5

I might allocate that as:

PG: McNeal (25), MAW (12), Harvey (3)
SG: Jaevin (22), Harvey (18)
SF: Williams (20), Jarron (15), Jaevin (5)
PF: Jarron (17), Moore (15), Williams (6), Scott (3)
C: Scott (28), Sorolla (7), Diarra (5)
 
well Lance was top 15 , Caupain had to further develop for 2 years to play in 4 games last year. Lance is the only one of them four to date that has lasted and contributed on a nightly basis for a whole season or more. SK also had a couple quality NBA seasons. No other players played any NBA games.

Evans, Clark, Caupain, SK, that’s the four.
 
We have wings who can run point but Brannen clearly (Saunders, McNeal, MAW) wants speedy PG's to push pace. Cumberland and Harvey are not speedy and neither is a PG.

We can run half court sets with just about anyone...but getting up and down full court press and break is another story

Harvey is very speedy, I could see him being first off the bench filling in for McNeal
 
Evans, Clark, Caupain, SK, that’s the four.
You said in the nba. SK plays in Greece. The four that played last season are Lance, Troy, Gary, and Jacob. Troy and Jacob didn't really play much. The latter three are still young could last or not. SK could be back. Lance is the only career NBA player Mick coached here as of yet.
 
You said in the nba. SK plays in Greece. The four that played last season are Lance, Troy, Gary, and Jacob. Troy and Jacob didn't really play much. The latter three are still young could last or not. SK could be back. Lance is the only career NBA player Mick coached here as of yet.

I think he means Troy Jacob Sk and Clark were lower ranked recruits that developed under mick and made it to the nba is some aspect. Everyone knew lance would go to the nba.

He is trying to say mick actually developed players once they were here... which is b.s.
 
Torvik says (no Prince or Davenport):

Jarron - 32
Scott - 31
Jaevin - 27
Williams - 26
McNeal - 25
Harvey - 21
Moore - 15
MAW - 12
Sorolla - 7
Diarra - 5

I might allocate that as:

PG: McNeal (25), MAW (12), Harvey (3)
SG: Jaevin (22), Harvey (18)
SF: Williams (20), Jarron (15), Jaevin (5)
PF: Jarron (17), Moore (15), Williams (6), Scott (3)
C: Scott (28), Sorolla (7), Diarra (5)

small ball !!
 
Harvey is very speedy, I could see him being first off the bench filling in for McNeal

I would probably go with silky smooth over speedy. But we may end up with no true pg on the floor a lot so I think that’s good for Harvey
 
Torvik says (no Prince or Davenport):

Jarron - 32
Scott - 31
Jaevin - 27
Williams - 26
McNeal - 25
Harvey - 21
Moore - 15
MAW - 12
Sorolla - 7
Diarra - 5

I might allocate that as:

PG: McNeal (25), MAW (12), Harvey (3)
SG: Jaevin (22), Harvey (18)
SF: Williams (20), Jarron (15), Jaevin (5)
PF: Jarron (17), Moore (15), Williams (6), Scott (3)
C: Scott (28), Sorolla (7), Diarra (5)
We starting 4 guards?
 
I think it’s possible. Houston basically did it last year.

I pray Scott packed on some muscle then, he was getting pushed around last year by some of the younger bigs in conference, not to mention he has problems controlling ball on rebounds. You need a stud in middle make this work, Scott isn't it.
 
I pray Scott packed on some muscle then, he was getting pushed around last year by some of the younger bigs in conference, not to mention he has problems controlling ball on rebounds. You need a stud in middle make this work, Scott isn't it.

It’s all about who we play, when we play Wichita and Houston we will probably have to use Sorolla quite a bit, when we play Memphis we could use Scott at the 5 at times, diarra and Sorolla arnt going to be able to guard wiseman out on the perimeter
 
It’s all about who we play, when we play Wichita and Houston we will probably have to use Sorolla quite a bit, when we play Memphis we could use Scott at the 5 at times, diarra and Sorolla arnt going to be able to guard wiseman out on the perimeter
I call it who is go be able to grab rebounds and secure them. Where are rebounds go come from? Which of the two between jarron/kW sacrifice offense for getting dirty in paint?
 
I pray Scott packed on some muscle then, he was getting pushed around last year by some of the younger bigs in conference, not to mention he has problems controlling ball on rebounds. You need a stud in middle make this work, Scott isn't it.
Who was Houston’s stud in the middle last year? They only lost 4 games
 
Back
Top