Davenport has been impressive to me. Harvey was a high level recruit that may not pan out
Davenport and Tari have looked good. But they are the only ones. If I was building a team, they are the only two players from UC I'd really want.
Having only two players who look good is a sign of bad recruiting. Few recruiters are so bad that they miss on 100%. Hitting on 25% of players is still bad recruiting. My current evaluation of players.
Eason - looks like a star in the making
Daveport - solid player who looks like he will develop into something more.
DeJulius - streaky, very good sometimes, doesn't give much other times.
Keith - similar to DeJulius but his highs are higher and his lows are lower.
MAW - Solid but not spectacular, not sure how much upside he has.
Gabe - needs a lot of work, but could become something eventually.
Saunders - can't shoot, not great on defense, think his speed may be overrated. Could become a solid PG eventually, but needs a lot of work.
Harvey - shows rare signs of promise, but expected a lot more in year 2.
Vogt, Rap - neither looks like they belong on a high-major team.
Unknown Lakhin, Mason.