I'm not trying to make a point, but I think it's interesting that we lost to a team seeded lower than us in 8 out of those 9. The only exception was our elite 8 run in 1993 when we lost to 1 seed UNC. In our final four run in 1992 as a 4 seed we got fairly lucky, getting 9 seed UTEP in the sweet sixteen and 6 seed Memphis in the elite 8. We didn't have to face any of the top 3 seeds in our region. In fact only twice since 1989 have we beaten a protected seed. Huggins beat 3 seed Georgia Tech in 1996 and Cronin beat 3 seed Florida St in 2012.
Same. I watch some of our old games on Youtube every now and then. Last week I watched our loss to Paul Pierce and top ranked Kansas in the 1997 season. Fortson was so dominant in the post, but he got into foul trouble.But we had some talented teams. Unfortunately I am old enough to remember.
This is not the year to test out the theory on a coaching change.
When last time one of our asst coaches was head coach anywhere? We've won our league how many times outright? Mick has had more than enough talent to dominate this league and get to sweet 16 more time than he hasnt been. Look at how our coaches interact on bench. Would you be comfortable sending any of them into top recruit living room to seal the deal? We could've won the league only playing 6-7 players all year. I would like upgrade talent just like anybody else but I think we have more than enough now get to sweet 16.Talent may not be the reason we lose any one particular game but it is the reason the fan base has little hope of having a LEGIT contender when we reach the dance. Cronin has had 1 in his 8 years making the dance where the seed would project to more than winning 1 game. Not going to get into the results of last year because it's not the point.
Huggins had 9 top 4 seeds in 14 appearances I believe. No matter the end results and no matter if you think either coach was a very good tourney coach...there was reason to believe (as a fan) that those years had at the very least a punchers chance to get to the Final 4.
That is 9 out of 14 vs 1 out of 8. Contenders vs pretenders. That speaks to the talent level on the team. It should come as no surprise last year was our most talented team and so was our seed. It is Cronin's only contender in 12 years. If Cumberland comes back I like the potential next year but I don't think it's at the level of our 2 seed team. Probably between the 2 and 6 though. But we may not have Cumberland and we may not even have the coach so who knows.
This is not the year to test out the theory on a coaching change.
Didn't see this before I posted the same thing... obviously I agree. This is not the year.If Cronin does leave I think Cumberland defiantly bolts for the NBA and who knows if Samari would hold up to his LOI. Just a thought.
When last time one of our asst coaches was head coach anywhere? We've won our league how many times outright? Mick has had more than enough talent to dominate this league and get to sweet 16 more time than he hasnt been. Look at how our coaches interact on bench. Would you be comfortable sending any of them into top recruit living room to seal the deal? We could've won the league only playing 6-7 players all year. I would like upgrade talent just like anybody else but I think we have more than enough now get to sweet 16.
When last time one of our asst coaches was head coach anywhere? We've won our league how many times outright? Mick has had more than enough talent to dominate this league and get to sweet 16 more time than he hasnt been. Look at how our coaches interact on bench. Would you be comfortable sending any of them into top recruit living room to seal the deal? We could've won the league only playing 6-7 players all year. I would like upgrade talent just like anybody else but I think we have more than enough now get to sweet 16.
When last time one of our asst coaches was head coach anywhere? We've won our league how many times outright? Mick has had more than enough talent to dominate this league and get to sweet 16 more time than he hasnt been. Look at how our coaches interact on bench. Would you be comfortable sending any of them into top recruit living room to seal the deal? We could've won the league only playing 6-7 players all year. I would like upgrade talent just like anybody else but I think we have more than enough now get to sweet 16.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...e-basketball-program-that-nobody-talks-about/
This is a good accurate article on our program.
“Cincinnati has been the landlord of its league in a way almost no other teams can match. The Bearcats have won 158 games (and counting) since the conference formed in 2013. There is no close second place. Cincy outpaces next-best Houston by 31 wins. It beats UConn by 37 and Memphis by 39. UC has been as dominant as any team in any league over the past half-dozen years outside of Kansas and Gonzaga. It ranks top 10 in victories across college hoops in that span, as well.”
Kansas last won a National Championship in 2008. They have won three total (2008, 1988, 1952). Gonzaga has never won although they were a half court shot away from winning in 2010(?).
The problem is though, what have Kansas and Gonzaha done come March compared to us?
You thinking Butler?
The Zags lost to UNC in '17.