Wow lmao
My exact response to 99.9% of your posts. Lol!
Wow lmao
The difference is that college basketball coaches are more in demand than just about any other job in the job market. They hold so much more leverage that it is unfair to compare. I’m going to assume that you have a job that thousands also own, compared to just 351 D1 college basketball coaches.
Not sure VT could be considered a lateral seeing the play in perhaps the best conference in the country, finished top 5 in the conference, and have a handful of top 100 players...that's a pretty nice setup for whoever takes the job.
Yeah.....2 sweet 16s and 11 NCAA tourney appearances in the history of the program.
When I think of a storied, traditional college basketball powerhouse....I think VA Tech! Lol!
In my opinion Cronin would be dumb to not leave for UCLA if he gets the chance because it is considered a "blue blood" and he will make much more money
The fuq? Who the hell cares how "storied" the program is? They've already got a nice roster in an elite conference, are currently landing recruits that we can't seem to get, and he knows the AD. It's not that difficult...
The fuq? Who the hell cares how "storied" the program is? They've already got a nice roster in an elite conference, are currently landing recruits that we can't seem to get, and he knows the AD. It's not that difficult...
Most of this is also true of Texas Tech, who people are saying has a better program than Cincinnati. Can't have it both ways.but you don't know if any of the players would stay. people say if cronin leaves here our recruits will leave too, i would think if thats true the same would happen at other schools when their coach leaves.
va tech made the sweet 16 this year, the only other time they got to the sweet 16 was 1967 (made the elite 8 that year). we've made the tournament 9 times if a row, you have to go back to 1979 to find the last 9 times they made it.
Most of this is also true of Texas Tech, who people are saying has a better program than Cincinnati. Can't have it both ways.
I don't think there are any consistently elite schools outside of Duke, UNC, Louisville, Kentucky, Kansas, and Michigan St. Everyone else is at the mercy of a coach, AD, boosters, and conference affiliation that are always in flux. So any move to a major conference outside of those teams could be considered lateral, even if it looks like an upgrade based on recent history.
Ever thought that may have something to do with Buzz William's? The fuq??
but you don't know if any of the players would stay. people say if cronin leaves here our recruits will leave too, i would think if thats true the same would happen at other schools when their coach leaves.
va tech made the sweet 16 this year, the only other time they got to the sweet 16 was 1967 (made the elite 8 that year). we've made the tournament 9 times if a row, you have to go back to 1979 to find the last 9 times they made it.
That's basically the point I was trying to make, that what we are calling more desirable jobs are because things have lined up for them recently. They're not necessarily better programs looking at the long term future. If Buzz and Beard leave, should VTech and Texas Tech still be considered more desirable than Cincinnati? I would probably give them the edge due to conference affiliation, but it's not a big edge.if Buzz stayed and made an elite 8 next year and final 4 the next year i think most would say the Va Tech job would be more desirable than this one. i think anywhere that has Chris Beard as their HC is going to be in a really good spot.
i dont know that any coach could win at Va Tech or Texas Tech. I dont know that any coach can win here. But I feel safe in saying wherever Buzz and Beard are, those teams are likely to be pretty good.
Their incoming recruits might decommit, always a possibility. I'd have a hard time believing the rest of their core group suddenly transfers though.
That's basically the point I was trying to make, that what we are calling more desirable jobs are because things have lined up for them recently. They're not necessarily better programs looking at the long term future. If Buzz and Beard leave, should VTech and Texas Tech still be considered more desirable than Cincinnati? I would probably give them the edge due to conference affiliation, but it's not a big edge.
3 Sr's played a lot of minutes and Alexander-Walker is a projected 1st round pick so there's a good chance he does what Evans did.
He probably leaves. But that COULD still leave the incoming coach with two 4 star top 100's, Blackshear, and another incoming 4 star (but i think he'd decommit). Obviously nothing is a guarantee, but i'd say there are worse scenarios that a coach could walk into.
It’s not the worst, and it would likely be great for the AAC. But I’m not sure it’s that great of a spot in the ACC. Could be worse but I think whoever ends up at va tech is going to have a tough go next year.
What kind of fan can’t forget a loss though?