Morgan State

BearcatTalk

Help Support BearcatTalk:

This zone that they are playing is designed to force turnovers. If you aren't forcing turnovers than you'll get a bunch of guys out of position and poor rotations. We might be better off just playing a standard 2-3 zone or even just straight man.
 
It's amazing that in a game like last night, that we can still single out guys like Shaq instead of those who really played poorly. Shaq was 7 for 9 from the field, 1 for 2 from three, 9 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal, and 2 blocks. His 3 pt. % is now up to 45%, and his overall shooting is now over 50%. He's got 17 assists and 12 turnovers on the season, so he's not too bad there either. Yet, everyone wants him benched and we're trying to blame him for his defense now, since we can't blame him for his offense last night.

Shaq is obviously part of the exterior defense along with Caupain, Johnson, Evans and Cobb. Mick has already singled out Evans as not being very good defensively. Caupain has never been that good defensively. Cobb likes to go for a lot of steals, but his on the ball defense is sporadic. Shaq can be both good and bad. The group as a whole is not playing good defense, or the scheme is causing them to not play good. Not sure which is the case. I'm sure Mick believes the scheme is fine.

We had 4 guards go 4-25 (16%) from 3. Caupain a blistering 0-8, Cobb lighting it up at 2-9, Johnson bombing away at 2-6, and Jenifer 0-2 (and 0 for about 4 games now). In spite of that abysmal shooting, we still score 87 pts. Go figure! Caupain is now the worst 3 pt. shooter on the team, and him and Johnson are just a few missed shots from dropping below 30%. Cobb's percent is dropping like a rock. Jenifer hasn't hit a 3 since probably before Thanksgiving. If we can just fix the shooting woes, and improve the defense a little, we'll be fine. But, to beat X, VCU on the road, and Iowa State, it'll take a lot more than just a little improvement. We'll have to have all phases working great. We're due. That's for sure.
 
This zone that they are playing is designed to force turnovers. If you aren't forcing turnovers than you'll get a bunch of guys out of position and poor rotations. We might be better off just playing a standard 2-3 zone or even just straight man.

I really dislike zone. I think this team would be great in man defense while switching on screens.
 
I really dislike zone. I think this team would be great in man defense while switching on screens.

You think this D would be great with Gary and Oct constantly out top guarding the opponents best perimeter scorers? Keep in mind the reason they switched to the 25 is to prevent that as often as possible because they aren't capable of doing so...
 
You think this D would be great with Gary and Oct constantly out top guarding the opponents best perimeter scorers? Keep in mind the reason they switched to the 25 is to prevent that as often as possible because they aren't capable of doing so...

What about just a conventional 2-3 or 1-2-2 zone? They wouldn't force many turnovers (they aren't anyways) and it would at least allow for them to be solid and pack in the paint against most teams.
 
You think this D would be great with Gary and Oct constantly out top guarding the opponents best perimeter scorers? Keep in mind the reason they switched to the 25 is to prevent that as often as possible because they aren't capable of doing so...

They'd obviously have to pick and choose when to switch but I think it'd be a much better solution to the current D that is being put out there. Xavier shredded their zone last year and will likely do so again this year.
 
Back
Top