Bearcat_NTS
Well-known member
Am I the only one that thinks conference tourneys are overrated and that doesn't really care how we fare in it? Conference tourney's are important for one-bid leagues and if you underachieved in the regular season or finished middle of the pack in your conference. For example, when we finished fourth in the Big East, but made it to the final game, that was awesome. If we were to finish third of fourth in this league I might want a better showing in the conference tourney. To me if you win the regular season title in your conference I think the tourney is irrelevant in a major conference that will get multiple bids. I'm hoping like all that we win the regular season crown in the AAC. If we do that I honestly could care less what we do in the conference tourney. Would like to win at least one game, but even then I'd like to have extra rest and not have to play three or four days in a row.
Winning the regular season title is more impressive but playing in the American is will be very helpful to play 2 more top 50 RPI opponents by winning/making the title game. Especially in the coming years when ECU, Tulane, ect join the league. For example, assuming UC maintains the #1 seed, they'd play 4/5 seed and then 2/3 in the championship game. That would get them a 3rd game against two of SMU/Memphis/UConn/UofL. In the unlikely even that they win out in the regular season, that could get them a #1 seed in the NCAA's. Seeding can be helped, plus the pride of knowing you were the best in the league...