Someone could say the same thing to you. "Why is it so hard for you to just admit that the staff backed off?"
Once again you are missing the point. No one KNOWS whether the staff missed or backed off. I am sure once recruits are signed we will have a better idea what happened. We may never know for sure though. To say the staff backed off may be premature (unless someone has inside info) and to say the staff missed is definitely premature at this time. One thing I do know, this kid is not Lance Stephenson. Is it possible the staff did it's due diligence on Lance and Torian and decided that Lance was worth the risk and Torian was not? Sounds like a reasonable possibility to me. The point is, before anyone makes definitive statements, wait until we have all the info, or at least as much info as we are going to get. For anyone to claim they KNOW the staff backed off or missed is just opening them up to look foolish in a few weeks or months.
comparing Lance to Graham by anyone on here is straight up silly. 1) Lance was immensely better than Graham at age 16 than Graham is at now at 21. The players are not even in the same ballpark in terms of talent. 2) Lance also gave UC credibility in NY recruiting that has been a massive building block in the building of a pipeline in the area that serves as the most fertile recruiting turf in the country. 3) UC took Lance when they were desperate to make a splash and had been missed the past 4 NCAA tournaments and were dead in the middle of their rebuild. The risk associated with him was much more reasonable to take on at that point in time. Now UC has made 4 straight NCAA tournaments and is a stable program.
The comparison is apples to oranges.