i asked some poster in the original comment a few pages back if they had seen deberry and graham play because that person declared that deberry and graham were "ready to play college basketball right now." that person had never seen them play, so i tried to caution against declaring jucos as ready to play if they hadn't actually seen them because people often pencil them in as starters and often they often struggle their first year.
after that, people are started arguing against me insinuating i said jucos are flops, that i don't think that deberry and graham are good, that since they are ranked high that means they are ready to play, etc….all of which things i never said or came remotely close to insinuating. as a result, i keep repeating myself to defend against these assumptions, because i never said what these people are implying i said. the only way to defend myself is to restate my original point, not what they choose to interpret what i said as.
I've never seen Deberry play, but from the rankings on rivals and the fact that mick Cronin said on his mick Cronin radio show that larry brown thought deberry is going to be very good I'm going to take his word for it.
So no I havnt seen them play, but that doesn't mean I don't know they are good, their is enough information out there that would make me believe they are going to be very good players. Being judged by high major scouts and reputable sites such as rivals makes me believe these two are special.
And one last thing I understand you think the competition deberry was playing against isn't as good as D1 college basketball, because it is obviously not, but its better than the competition gary clark was playing against all year, I can say that with 100% certainty