When I think of Tulane, I think of This
https://youtu.be/KNCYFPLHOiA
That said, im once again giving away free tickets to this game. This time it's 3 tickets.
I won free tickets through 96 Rock, otherwise I'd take them!
Side note, I'm not one to complain about free tickets, but the seats 96 Rock gave me are reeeeeally bad. Upper-corner-rafters-bad. If anyone won't be using their seats, or knows a great spot to move down to, drop me a DM! I generally never move down, since my mini-plan seats are very solid, but I really don't want to sit in these actual seats lol.
His defense and rebounding has been on a comically bad level recently. He just looks slow to react on the glass. I prefer Scott to get playing time when we're in a knock down, drag out fight. If you can't guard, you aren't playing substantial minutes for Mick.
Two of those games they won by an a average of 45 points and the other was against a Marshall team that played no one of considerable size. I do agree though, his defense is more of a concern than his rebounding. He won't be able to rebound if he's not on the court though.
His shot selection is incrediby poor at times. He can shoot the ball all he wants from 14 feet in, but the long range jumpers just always feel forced.
When I think of Tulane, I think of This
https://youtu.be/KNCYFPLHOiA
That said, im once again giving away free tickets to this game. This time it's 3 tickets.
That team is the only one to win an NCAA Tournament game since the Sweet 16 team. Remember they also swept SMU and won @NC State. I wonder what was different about that team?Man I just went back and watched that 2014-2015 Home Tulane Matchup. We were so bad on offense. We had just 51 points at home against Tulane.
I looked back at that entire year and I wondered how the hell we made the tournament. We lost to ECU, then dropped 3 in a row to Temple, Xavier and Tulane. Also lost to VCU at home, lost to Nebraska, and a bad Uconn team 2x. We did not defend home court well at all
How we even made the tourney is just amazing. But that team had a lot of heart in that Kentucky game.
Any way, I have watched 2 Tulane Games so far this year and a little bit of the Arizona state game too. They are bad. They have this big white guy who has zero Skill who they pass it to every possession.
That said, they did stay within reach with Oklahoma and Arizona State for a bit. They have a PG with dreads so long that you start to wonder if he is less quick because of them.
Is there a website to upgrade your seats?
When you score 49 against Tulane (at home), that's the result you deserve.
That team is the only one to win an NCAA Tournament game since the Sweet 16 team. Remember they also swept SMU and won @NC State. I wonder what was different about that team?
Ha.. Come one man.. So your gonna give Larry Davis the credit for winning @NC State and SMU, but not gonna acknowledge that under him we also lost to Tulane and ECU and a mediocre Temple team. UC hasn't had 2 losses that bad (kenpom 224 and 220) under Cronin since 2012 when they lost to 251 Presbyterian and they ended up in the sweet 16 that year.
Cronin's worst loss since then was to 121 Nebraska in that same year and last year our worst loss was to 86 Temple who ended up being a tourney team and winning the conference.
Dont get me wrong, I like Larry Davis and he did a good job, but we won that Purdue matchup because it was a good matchup for us. We haven't exactly been blessed with good luck in the tourney like the other team in our city has (Ole Miss, Georgia State, Lehigh)