TheLongHaul
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2009
- Messages
- 3,036
So you base a recruits impact on a program on highlight tapes rather than what multiple analysts who have watched him play in game settings think of him. Uhhh, okay. Lawrence was Micks top priority. Multiple sources have reported this. To argue against it is stupid. And just because recruiting analysts occasionally get things wrong, it doesn't invalidate everything they say. To pruport otherwise is stupid. Case closed. Btw, ESPN, CBS, SportingNews and Fox reported Lawrence's committment to UC. It was on the scroll on ESPNU and one of the articles on the main ESPN college basketball page. How much fanfare was there for Morman's signing? Why do you think this was the case. Anyone can have have an opinion on who they think will have more of an immediate impact. But I would rely on those whose job is to evaluate players, who know more that I would about a recruits ability and potential, than a highlight tape or just for the sake of having an opinion.
No, I base it on what I see and what I read/hear. And even then I admit that it's just an opinion. Saying someones opinion is stupid because they based it on what they saw is flat out stupid. Btw, I'm pretty sure he even linked full length videos, not just highlights.
Where are these multiple sources?
Essentially you can't think for yourself and have to rely what analysts say. How many times do you think these analysts have seen Morgan, KJ, and Caupin play? It's funny though that you base so much on what recruiting analysts say. I'm sure you were one of the many that downplay analysts and rankings when UC has signed a 3* recruit.
Personally I think Lawrence will have a bigger impact than Mormon but I'm not going to say it's stupid if someone else thinks differently.