Peoples favorite Comp for Scott is always Justin Jackson. This being Tre's red shirt freshman year I really seen a little higher ceiling for him then Jackson. I think Scott's over all game has the potential to be better then JJ. Am I off base?
Peoples favorite Comp for Scott is always Justin Jackson. This being Tre's red shirt freshman year I really seen a little higher ceiling for him then Jackson. I think Scott's over all game has the potential to be better then JJ. Am I off base?
I completely agree Waite. He seems to be ahead of where Jackson was offensively. Even in Jackson's SR year he was still just a post player, and not a great one. Scott seems much more polished and has a good looking stroke.
Peoples favorite Comp for Scott is always Justin Jackson. This being Tre's red shirt freshman year I really seen a little higher ceiling for him then Jackson. I think Scott's over all game has the potential to be better then JJ. Am I off base?
I agree that Scott appears to have more potential in regards to offensive versatility, but Jackson was a man down-low in his senior season. He developed a post-move, had a nice FG%, and blocked 3 shots per game. I'm not sure Scott will ever be able to do what Jackson did defensively. And that's not a burn on Scott; that's a praise towards JJ. I'll be curious to see how jacked Scott gets in our program, and how tough he get down-low. He'll certainly hit more jumpers, but will he be an 11 PPG scorer while shooting over 50%? Time will tell.
I agree that Scott appears to have more potential in regards to offensive versatility, but Jackson was a man down-low in his senior season. He developed a post-move, had a nice FG%, and blocked 3 shots per game. I'm not sure Scott will ever be able to do what Jackson did defensively. And that's not a burn on Scott; that's a praise towards JJ. I'll be curious to see how jacked Scott gets in our program, and how tough he get down-low. He'll certainly hit more jumpers, but will he be an 11 PPG scorer while shooting over 50%? Time will tell.
We only have 10 games to go on but as of now Scott is 56 percent FGs. Per 40 minutes he would be significantly better than JJs first 3 years in rebounds, points, fouls, assists, and turnovers. About the same in blocks and really only behind in steals.
I would take those numbers every day. Again it's early but...
11 ppg in a season when you were the only post option is not all that impressive and 53 percent isn't awesome but it's OK. Jackson is one of my all time faves!
Peoples favorite Comp for Scott is always Justin Jackson. This being Tre's red shirt freshman year I really seen a little higher ceiling for him then Jackson. I think Scott's over all game has the potential to be better then JJ. Am I off base?
Seth Davis bumped the cats all the way to 18 from 25 on his ballot this week. Might see a little jump it appears.
Seth Davis bumped the cats all the way to 18 from 25 on his ballot this week. Might see a little jump it appears.
Peoples favorite Comp for Scott is always Justin Jackson. This being Tre's red shirt freshman year I really seen a little higher ceiling for him then Jackson. I think Scott's over all game has the potential to be better then JJ. Am I off base?
I wish Clark would do like Scott and square up in the lane for the 10 to15 ft shot instead of the backing down shots he takes.
getting a guy on your hip in the low post is a skill. The option he is looking for is to bank in a 2 footer or get fouled. He can also kick out to the wing from his post position. Gary and Tre have different games at this point. if your saying you want him to add to his arsenal that is fine. Both players have range up to 10-15 ft but I prefer them playing close to the hoop and using their rebounding skills to get 2nd chance points.You have more options when you square up - you see the floor better- Gary does well with his one move but he would be a better player if he would square up first. IMO
I don't mind subbing to strength. I think we can do that at one position. We need to use that strength more and more in big games.
