Yes, St. John's lost a close game to UC. But combine the loss with a far weaker resume that includes losses to Fordham and St. Bonaventure, and yes there is a reason to get upset with the comparison.
I initially threw St. John's in there as a bad comparison because of their two awful losses out of conference.
But putting St. John's aside the more upsetting part of your argument that UC should be ranked in the 35-45 range is the 10 teams you would rank immediately ahead of UC.
I'd like to know the reason why you think any of those teams are better than UC
I initially threw St. John's in there as a bad comparison because of their two awful losses out of conference.
But putting St. John's aside the more upsetting part of your argument that UC should be ranked in the 35-45 range is the 10 teams you would rank immediately ahead of UC.
I'd like to know the reason why you think any of those teams are better than UC