We started fronting Garza with Scott in the 2nd half. We also doubled him with a guard at times, especially when we had a four guard lineup. Didn't really matter what the defense was, Garza was hitting everything (4-4 from midrange and 2-3 from three). If your plan was to go straight 2-3, I think that would have failed miserably since we haven't done that all year.
After the 10 second violation we started to dribble into the double and passed it forward to Scott in a 3 on 2 situation. Scott doesn't have the skills to attack the basket. The one time he did he travelled. The rest he just turned around and waited for Jenifer.
In halfcourt offense we were able to get Cane in the corner a lot with a big on him. He had a decent game, but not the best considering his opportunities. He went 0-4 from three and travelled at least once trying to drive by Garza too quick. Cane had our highest usage rate, but the lowest ORtg among players with 10+ minutes. If he had made those shots, would we be praising Cronin for his great coaching? I doubt it.
Objectively, we did make adjustments, but our players didn't perform as well as Iowa's. Seems like everyone wants the adjustment to be as simple as "score more points" and "play better defense". Basketball doesn't work that way.
To me the biggest problem is that we were out-rebounded in a game where we should have owned the glass. Jarron, Cane and Trevor had a combined 4 rebounds in 67 minutes. That really hurt us.