Yeah, and if you spend money to bring in a coach who can get this program back on top then you can make money. Kind of hard to spend 10.2 million on bball when you spend the first half of your season playing to 5 or 6k fans/night and every time you do start to generate some buzz in the fan base you turn around and lose 3 or 4 straight games at home.
Kind of like how our football program made pennies per year until we got Brian Kelly in here and gave the fan base something to get excited about.
Again, I'm not arguing that we have an athletic budget on par with some of the bigger schools, we clearly don't. You made the statement that we can't afford a good coach, that's simply not true, or if it is you're certainly not qualified to make that statement.
When did I ever say we couldn't afford a good coach? Our budget isn't that bad. The problem is keeping a good coach when they could make more elsewhere, while not having to go through obstacles like raising money so the team can travel like everyone else. I think the fact that other schools have contacted Mick, who they know is at his dream job, just goes to show how much other programs have to offer in terms of salary and resources. If UC's program was on par with other programs then there really wouldn't be anything else to offer him.