jacobkdoyle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 17,008
Maybe Cumberland won't be scared of the moment (assuming he actually gets on the floor over an upperclassman).
All I am suggesting are ways I think we can change the pattern and for some reason I am considered delusional
UC basketball...close but no cigar.
Yeah. If you go by 247, they've rated Cumberland at #37. I think McClain and Wilks might have been close (more like top 75).
Like most very disappointed in our inability to close out games. We have demonstrated we can play with most teams but can not beat them to this point.
After watching the game some things are obvious.
1. The officiating we have seen in the last two games has been incredibly one sided. Ellis shot our 3 and 4 FT's very late in game. The disparity in our fouls as opposed to our opposition is staggering.
2. Folks we are a mid major our league,facilities and performance scream that.
3. Mick has done a good job getting us back on good footing. After next year if I was him I would tell my agent it's time to leave. I think fan base and him would benefit tremendously.
Doogle, I always look forward to your comments. You're one of the best on here. I've been a season ticket holder for an incredibly long time. I'm dying a slow death right now. My dad got us our season tickets when I was 8 and it's been an obsession for me ever since. But, this coach is draining me. I really hate the thought of giving these seats up, but I'm as close as I've ever been. The cost is just so high when compared to the amount of enjoyment I'm getting these days. This season started so promising. I was sure that we were taking that next step. Little did I know the step was going to be down. Very disappointing!
Caupain did not score in the second half going 0-5.
This team does not have a closer like a SK or Logan who can take the ball and get fouled. These games have been there for the taking and nobody wants to step up and make it happen.
Pretty disappointing that a veteran UC team lost to Larry Brown with 6 players when UC got 18 more shots than SMU.
Maybe Cumberland won't be scared of the moment (assuming he actually gets on the floor over an upperclassman).
Most corporations create a mission statement that defines the expectations or purpose of the organization. I would be interested in reading our mission statement, if one exists. If our mission is to be an elite basketball power in college basketball that closely aligns with where our historical standing/tradition places us...Top 10-20 all-time, then Mick Cronin needs to go. If we're happy and content with Top 25-50 status, being a nice mid-major program, rarely winning a league championship, but making the NCAA nearly every year, with no real hope of advancing much past the 1st weekend, then Mick is our guy and he is brilliant at it. If we could all see that Bearcat Basketball mission statement, we could probably eliminate 99% of the arguments and bad blood in here. We could handle a loss on the road to SMU, or the occasional loss to a .500 team at home. Based on the millions spent on Bearcat Village, the Bubble, Nippert, and now the Shoe, it would appear that the mission is much higher than mid-major status in all sports, especially football and basketball. If that's the case, you can't have a coach who has peaked at mid-major, when your mission is "Elite". Rick Minter was a classic mid-major coach and we moved him on, in spite of him turning our football program around and achieving bowl status numerous times. I thought that was a mistake getting rid of him, but I was wrong. I see the exact same scenario with Mick Cronin. Again, what is our mission?
15 years ago, everyone I knew thought Mick would be a wonderful replacement for Huggs someday. He took some shots for jumping ship to Pitino but I thought it was a brilliant play. Huggs' assistants were getting little to no juice for HC jobs. Why not light yourself up with Pitino's star? Combine Huggs' defensive acumen with Pitino's rep for offense and you've got a well-rounded Coach with a great pedigree.
Mick's Murray teams were fun to watch. And listening to his postgame last night, his teams were once 64-1 with a lead in the final minutes.
I believe Mick is a good coach. I don't know him personally. I don't know how hard he works, recruits or plans. I'm not in practice. So take my opinion as simply that.
I think a couple of things are at work here:
1) The early years beat him down. Fielding a JV team that first season or two changed him in some fundamental way and altered his philosophies. Getting "athletes" became a priority. Slowing tempo and reducing possessions got coded into his DNA. Playing Seniors, etc. Coaches are control freaks by nature. Losing exacerbates the quality.
2) He's not getting any constructive criticism/dissent from his assistants or his bosses. Everyone is grateful to him for resurrecting the program. His assistants are loyal and have been with him for a long time. Do any of them ever disagree with him? Are they so deep in the foxhole together that they can't see outside it anymore?
I had a boss once tell me (upon completion of a project that I worked very hard on, but not very well) that I was too close to the project; take a step back, see it for what it was with an open mind, and fix it. Some of the best advice I've ever gotten. Coaches rarely get the opportunity to do this. Was hoping Mick would gain that perspective from his time away last year...but maybe he never really took a full step back? Hard to say.
I'm not laying full blame for the season so far at Mick's feet. The players on the floor have had ample opportunity to win 4 of the 5 games they've lost. Caupain was supposed to drive to the hole last night and he surprised Cobb with a pass. Caupain blew the sequence at the end of the Iowa State game as well. Is that on Mick? Yes and no. It's his decision to put the ball in Troy's hands. Troy continues to fail in that role. Might his faith in Troy be rewarded? Time will tell.
My issue is not with his choice of starters. It's with the development of guys who could help this year and will be relied upon in years to come. Jenifer has to be deployed in some fashion, in every game. He's the pure PG we've coveted. There's no obvious reason not to give him playing time and learn through attrition. If we're a possession basketball team, fine. But I'd love to see us start those possessions with 26-27 seconds on the clock instead of 20. Watching Troy literally be on the only guy on one side of the court and walk the ball across the timeline, using 8-10 seconds of a 30 second clock is maddening. No logical reason to do this. We need Jenifer's change of pace if nothing else. Mick has to take his head out of the sand and realize this.
Back to my day job.
Maybe I'm in the minority here and that's fine, but if we step back and look at the season thus far we have 3 losses to top 15 teams by a combined 6 points.
Did we choke? Maybe.
Did the "proverbial" basketball gods frown upon us? Depe4nds on if you believe that kind of thing.
It's not ideal right now, but it's not the seasons end.
Can we fix it? Yes. I don't know if it will be fixed or not but it CAN be fixed.
I get aggravated watching us this year too, but I'll wait with the stones in my hand, until the seasons end, before casting them.
Not saying you're delusional. I just think you're trying awfully hard to diagnose something that seems to me to be a clear case of a team that is mentally weak. You either have guys with guts, or you don't. I'm thinking we don't. Could that change? I guess. Not sure how or why I'd believe it before I see it though.
Watching Troy literally be on the only guy on one side of the court and walk the ball across the timeline, using 8-10 seconds of a 30 second clock is maddening. No logical reason to do this. We need Jenifer's change of pace if nothing else. Mick has to take his head out of the sand and realize this.