jacobkdoyle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 17,008
this is why the "who are we gonna get if mick goes" argument is dumb. there are a ton of good coaches that are out there that no one has heard of. have to find them. mack before xavier, stevens before butler, even huggins before cincy.
Yeah Jamie Dixon and Pitt will be the go-to response for that. "The grass isn't always greener" and all of that.
But yeah I don't worry about that so much either.
There was a post on twitter about how Loyola has more tourney wins in 2 weeks than us, Georgetown, Ohio State, Memphis, Indiana, and whoever have in 5 years. Someone pointed out in response that all those other schools have at least made coaching changes recently to try to shake things up.
Something's gotta give at some point. Just running it back with everything the exact same isn't going to change our fate one bit.
I'm not saying make a coaching change. But if we d get to that point in the next couple years, I don't think it automatically means we fall into the abyss. A guy like Nick Van Exel would generate a lot of positive buzz. He has credentials that would help him in recruiting too. He'd be the first choice imo. If Cronin gets a 14-15 year run, that's plenty of time to make something happen. If he can't get us there, might as well let someone else try.
Earlier I said I'd give Cronin 2 more years. I stand by that from a performance standpoint. But I looked at his contract and he is signed for 3 more years. I'd like to let that contract play out without an extension to put some pressure on him. 15 seasons should yield more than 1 game played in the 2nd weekend of the NCAA Tournament. So until he gets us there again, why add anything onto his deal?