juckerrules
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2014
- Messages
- 520
Temple is so bad.
So weird that they are the only team to beat 2 of the top 25....Clemson & Auburn
Temple is so bad.
By beating Kpom #309, I feel so proudSeton hall just got beat by 20.
We should move past them
So who do we root for tonight?
Mississippi St. @ Florida 7:00 PM SEC Network.
Florida currently -8.
Im rooting for Mississippi state.
I'll always take the boosted resume of a team we beat vs a team we lost to.
Huge opportunity for Miss State and would help us out a lot if they win
Thanks. Any chance I can get you to start a new thread? Maybe name it "Prior Opponents" or "Rooting Interest"
You can let us know which teams we should or shouldn't be rooting for to help boost UC's tournament resume. And throw some numbers out there to support it.
Thanks. Any chance I can get you to start a new thread? Maybe name it "Prior Opponents" or "Rooting Interest"
You can let us know which teams we should or shouldn't be rooting for to help boost UC's tournament resume. And throw some numbers out there to support it.
I agree it would be nice to get a constant stream of rankings of RPI and Kenpom for teams either in or straddling lines of column 1 or 2...but that takes some effort. There is probably an easy way to do this but I am not a spread sheet genius...lol!
Those teams outside of column 1 or 2 aren't going to mean all that much to us in the end.
In terms of RPI (my least favorite metric) Jerry Palm used to have a tool called the Palm reader and when you clicked a specific team, it showed you in the side bar ways your team could improve its RPI that day by games on the schedule (teams you beat and teams you lost to)
I will continue to say this...RPI doesn't mean squat until the end when it starts to match the other metrics. But in the end it means a lot to the committee but they don't really evaluate this stuff until the end anyway.
Up until the last month or so Kenpom is better to look at while RPI is getting narrowed down.
Warren Nolan's site has automated team sheets, separating the schedule into the four RPI groups. The Bearcats' team sheet is here: http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2018/team-sheet?team=Cincinnati
There is also a "Predicted Team Sheet" that gives us a total of five Group 1 wins at the end of the season. However, the predictions are deterministic, meaning the most likely result of each individual game is used. The deterministic approach has UC going 28-3 with the only loss at Wichita. Kenpom uses probabilistic predictions, which give us a 26-5 record.
Just to clarify further for non-nerds: say we play 10 games with a 60% chance of winning each. Our deterministic predicted record is 10-0. The probabilistic prediction is 6-4. Determinism gives poor forecasts, so it is likely that the RPIs in Warren Nolan's predicted team sheet will look quite different. It's still an interesting way to get a feel for what our resume may show in March.
I don't recall our final RPI and Kenpom last year leading into the tourney but they were a lot closer than #7 and #34. They were probably closer to dead on around #12 or so within a few spots...again IDK.
I will continue to say this...RPI doesn't mean squat until the end when it starts to match the other metrics. But in the end it means a lot to the committee but they don't really evaluate this stuff until the end anyway.
Up until the last month or so Kenpom is better to look at while RPI is getting narrowed down.
Last year we ended at 12 RPI and 23 Kenpom.
Our RPI last year did this the final 16 weeks:
72
37
40
49
31
24
17
18
16
16
15
15
14
14
13
12