Why in the hell would I discuss great wins, not to mention league wins? We're talking about scheduling. Instead of just debating the points, you have to make it personal once again by saying, "This is all about people like you L-T". That's why there's very few people like me posting on these sites because when you post the facts, it then gets personal....and you're the moderator.It comes across like that because of people like you LT who refuse to see any good. UC has played good teams this year but you won't even acknowledge it in your responses!! I said it before and I'll say it again. There are some on here that will not accept Mick Cronin nor give him credit for anything. The only team to beat Pitt. Dominated Memphis on the road. Beat a very underrated SMU team. Played UNM on the road. Beat a good NCST team and ALL you want to talk about is the bad teams. This is typical.
The fanbase can make all the excuses they want. Real brands have a fan following and attendance against any team they play. UC fans talk a big game and say "win and we'll come" and then when you win they say "win some more". Can't have it both ways LT. People are fans or they aren't. You support a program or a coach and as Paul D. even acknowledges there are many here that are still bitter about a coach. It is true and it is a real problem and it is hurting this program.
I'm talking about the lousy ooc home schedule....period. It's a major issue with fans. It's why the old saying, "Win and they will come" doesn't apply to Mick Cronin, because he has done no better than a 4th place finish and beating these no-name teams impresses nobody. If you're winning league championships, getting high seeds, having success in the NCAA, etc, then you can play these teams because you have established credibility.