WAITE HOYT 2
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 8,404
I really don't think so. LOL!!!!Waite, it's not that hard. Just say...."Jake, you're right."....because he is.
I really don't think so. LOL!!!!Waite, it's not that hard. Just say...."Jake, you're right."....because he is.
Jake it is never that simple. Changing styles is very difficult. Generally coaches work entire off seasons implementing a system. I appreciate your comment but we will have to agree to disagree.
People keep talking about how the offense is going to be much better. I have a hard time seeing how we'll see more than a marginal improvement.
Couldn't agree more. Fans generally tend to be overly optimistic this time of year. Last year right about now we were talking about Justin Jenifer being a hybrid of Chris Paul, John Stockton and Gary Peyton. A super PG plucked out of the sky by Mighty Mick himself sent to save our eyes from watching this pathetic offense plod along every year............well, we all saw how that worked out.
Lots of unknowns on the team this year and I have a lot of concern about the depth. I think most are assuming the unknowns are what will lead to the improvements but I'll be skeptical until I see it for myself.
I guess the good news for Mick is that he has built in excuses already for when he doesn't get it done this season. All the people telling us right now why they're going to be so good will be defending him at the and of the year saying this was a young team and just needs another year of experience and we'll get em next year. "We'll get em next year" -- the go to line for all Mick Cronin supporters.
Hey, hey, hey, let's get the facts straight. It was not right about now when I started my JJ promotional tour. It was actually the week after homecoming and the intrasquad scrimmage when I did that. And, you left out Nick Van Exel. I think I compared him more to Nick the Quick than I did to Paul, Stockton, or Payton.
I get accused about bashing Mick and his recruits all the time. but how did it work out when I went ga-ga over one of his recruits? You think I'll ever make that mistake again?
I will get the last laugh though. You watch. It will be JJ that gets us over the top in this 2016/2017 season. You've already seen Mick commenting on how he is a different player. The truth is, he's no different than he was last year. Mick has just changed his attitude about him and finally recognized his talents and is going to let him be the player he can be. If he doesn't jerk him out after one mistake every game, you'll see the true visionary that I am. You heard it here first!
I totally agree Jacob! We need to dictate! If we are the more talented team, let's destroy them! Yeah against a more talented team if we need to be more conservative I don't wish that but if it happens I can see us being more conservative. I certainly hope this changes. All those mid-level teams should fear us. We should destroy them! But when you played at their pace regardless if we're more talented it becomes a six-point game.Waite, this is one of my main gripes about Cronin's gameplanning. If South Florida wants to play a 50 point grinder, he's all too happy to oblidge. We should be pressing and running against these teams. If I'm not mistaken, I believe someone said we were 351 out of 351 once conference play started. So there is no slower than that. You can't blame that on the other team when we're taking 9.99 seconds to cross half court every possession.
….
Nothing changes with this team until we actually have a floor general with supreme ball skills and distribution intellect. Mick hasnt recruited ANYONE like this EVER. Cashmere was the closest to this but his injuries resulted in this never coming to fruition.
Everyone bashing "style of play" and making assumptions about who is going to be vastly improved needs to reflect on one thing : RECRUITING. I believe Mick isnt an idiot: he would run more uptempo if he had the player to do it. Unfortunately, his lack of recruiting in this area will NEVER solve this.
I've been a member and a reader here for a long time. I never really post but nothing tickles me more than the grammar Nazis and forum correction officers on here . Y'all are so funny getting butthurt over the mildest tangent someone might drift off on and acting all corporate when u correct people or refer them to the terms of service. Please remember that this is an online message board for an unpopular team and banning people will only result in the number of daily posts to drop to 9.
Was Steve Logan a great point guard? I thought he was tremendous - loved his game. His game style is far more similar to Caupain's than someone like JJ's imo. Of course, he had players like Kenyon and DeMar to pass it to - so it was a little easier for him to look good.Totally agree with you, I've never been a fan of Caupain as a point guard. He's a nice player, but not a great point guard. Jennifer is a true point guard, but needs work and maturity.
Was Steve Logan a great point guard? I thought he was tremendous - loved his game. His game style is far more similar to Caupain's than someone like JJ's imo. Of course, he had players like Kenyon and DeMar to pass it to - so it was a little easier for him to look good.
You don't have to be built like Nate Archibald in order to be an effective point guard.
I noticed that CBS sports is broadcasting a lot cincy's games this year. Does ESPN still have the contract with the AAC for bball? It's definitely seems it's still in place for football.
Steve Logan was one of the best point guards in UC Basketball history. But, what I and LT are referencing specifically is the Mick Cronin era... the guy in 11 years has NEVER been able to recruit this type of floor general and thus it impacts the style of play. Again, say what you want about how he likes this slow, grind it out approach, but its a all result of him not be able to recruit PG's at a high level. I see this slow tempo as his excuse and outlet for not excelling in the recruiting arena.
Was Steve Logan a great point guard? I thought he was tremendous - loved his game. His game style is far more similar to Caupain's than someone like JJ's imo. Of course, he had players like Kenyon and DeMar to pass it to - so it was a little easier for him to look good.
You don't have to be built like Nate Archibald in order to be an effective point guard.
playstation vue needs to get their shit together and add CBS sports
One of the main reasons I can't switch. Basically stick to fiootics for the bearcats
Actually, your statement is wrong. Logan only played primarily point guard in his senior season and he thrived. That was his first team all-american season. In his junior and sophomore seasons, Kenny Satterfield was the point guard and played 35 minutes per game. Logan played a little backup point guard, but more shooting guard. When he was the team's point guard, he did not have Kenyon and DeMarr to pass to. He had Immanual McIlroy, Leonard Stokes, a new feshman Jason Maxiell, Jamaal Davis, Donald Little, etc. Besides himself, the only other double figure scorer on the team was Stokes, so he really didn't have a ton of great offensive options to pass to. That however, was one of our great chemistry teams and an amazing defensive group. Amazingly, we averaged almost 79 points per game, and only gave up 60 per game. We spent most of the season ranked in the top 5, won the Conference USA Tourney by beating Dwayne Wade and Marquette, got a #1 seed, and then was screwed by the committee when they placed us with a second round matchup with highly "underrated" UCLA, who had been in the top 5 earlier in the season before injuries and chemistry issues caused them to underachieve. We lost that infamous double overtime battle 105 to 101.
But, for that one season, Steve Logan was as good of a point guard as we have ever seen. Let's watch how Troy's senior season plays out before we start comparing him to Steve Logan. Those are some very big shoes to fill!
playstation vue needs to get their shit together and add CBS sports