I would think an athletic 6'9 240 could guard the 5 spot.
If he 240 clark 275. He doesn't have nba body. More so 6'8 220
I would think an athletic 6'9 240 could guard the 5 spot.
If I believed we would bring in an elite prospect, I'd be fine with that. But.
Only need 2 out of 75
couldn't agree more. Staff has been trying to add depth since season ended. Obviously they feel there is a need.You can still do that if you sign Noulowe. 2 year backup project. No downside imo. We had Nyarsuk on the team as the 8th or 9th man on scholarship. We've had Moore play during the most crucial times as a FR and SO. We have room for those kind of guys, I'm not going to complain if this guy is #11 and wants to bust his ass to everyday. If it doesn't work out, he was only a 2 year situation anyway.
couldn't agree more. Staff has been trying to add depth since season ended. Obviously they feel there is a need.
Scott should be 230 now. We dont face to many fast mobile C. Clark can play the 5 at worst. Do we need 3 career back up bigs(kevin, moore and scott)? If he was a legit 6'10 rim protector sign him up. Not 6'8 undersized 5MY guess is they need to have someone who can guard the 5 and has mobility for defense. Moore and Brooks may be a little too slow. Scott is too small
The only problem with the logic there Jake is he's taking up a scholarship that could be used on a more talented, more ready prospect in 2017. Understandably, we don't really know if Mick can get that caliber of guy on a consistent basis, but aren't we kind of passed taking chances on project JuCo guys?
the reality is this if we can better our roster by signing a grad transfer, a JUCO or a 4 year player I'm all for it. Looking at the future has its place but reality in college sports today is kids transfer,injuries occur, kids leave early. No one is promised tomorrow. If I'm Mick I'm all in every year.Gary is 6'8 235 per bearcats site,and after 2 years Quadri is a poor defensive player and rebounder.
College has been like this for decades nothing changed really. Media coverage of transfers is only thing that has changed. We cut ace mcghee for d johnson. Mcghee went on to become all AmericanLooking at the future has its place but reality in college sports today is kids transfer,injuries occur, kids leave early. No one is promised tomorrow. If I'm Mick I'm all in every year.
Clark has 15 pounds on this guyGary is 6'8 235 per bearcats site,and after 2 years Quadri is a poor defensive player and rebounder.
College has been like this for decades nothing changed really. Media coverage of transfers is only thing that has changed. We cut ace mcghee for d johnson. Mcghee went on to become all American
If I believed we would bring in an elite prospect, I'd be fine with that. But.
Thats goes for kids not playing sports also. We talking bout 17-19 yr old kids. Millions of reasons goes into kids leaving school. Its get even crazier on DII, juco and naia level with transfershttp://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/tracking-transfer-division-i-men-s-basketball
Here's an interesting article on players transferring
- "That said, about 40% of all MBB players who enter Division I directly out of high school depart their initial school by the end of their sophomore year."
- "We tracked the 596 MBB student-athletes listed on ESPN’s 2015 transfer list to determine their destination for 2015-16. Of the 528 who actually changed schools, only 44% transferred to another Division I school (most of those to a less competitive program where playing time might increase), while many ended up at Division II, NAIA or 2-year colleges"
So jarron cumberland is not an elite prospect then? We get good players, just not in bulk