Do they have a bracketology page? According to bracketmatrix's methodology, Dave Ommen at Bracketville is ranked #1. I don't see Screen the Screener or Mike Randle/ Gus Kearns at first glance though.
http://www.barttorvik.com/
Just stumbled on this because of Reddit. Figured anyone here would appreciate it.
Haven't checked it out completely, but the site has a lot of really good info and almost seems like a knock off kenoom that is completely free.
***UPDATE
Seriously can't believe this site is free. It's awesome.***
Best part is when you go under an individual team, you can tinker with projections and run simulations with however many fixed outcomes of games including conference tournament. But smartly, it's incorporating rpi tiers and rpi to come up with the seeds etc.
I could play around on this thing all day
http://www.barttorvik.com/
Just stumbled on this because of Reddit. Figured anyone here would appreciate it.
Haven't checked it out completely, but the site has a lot of really good info and almost seems like a knock off kenoom that is completely free.
***UPDATE
Seriously can't believe this site is free. It's awesome.***
Best part is when you go under an individual team, you can tinker with projections and run simulations with however many fixed outcomes of games including conference tournament. But smartly, it's incorporating rpi tiers and rpi to come up with the seeds etc.
I could play around on this thing all day
Great find. Sort of merges Kenpom, rpiforecast, and Warren Nolan. I think each of those sites are better at what they do individually, but this one is a nice compilation. Thanks for sharing.http://www.barttorvik.com/
seems like a knock off kenpom that is completely free.
T-Rank is in the same league with Kenpom (no surprise, since I copied Kenpom liberally)
I've started to read into the methodology for Bart Torvik's T-Rank. He admits to copying Kenpom:
T-Ranketology simply lists the teams in order according to the "Overall" number at the top right of the team sheet. So, it's not really taking into account RPI Groups. It's still a nice unbiased automated tool.
Interesting...last year our team sheet rank was #22 and we got a 6 seed. Those numbers equate very nicely. This year our team sheet rank (so far) is #5. That would be the #1 two seed.
Needless to say it will be interesting to see how the committee dismantles that resume...lol! Near as I can tell this is all current and not projected stuff.
There are actually three different T-Ranketologies. The one I described that's based on team sheets is current. He also has two others that combine a bunch of different factors, one of which is current and the other a projection. In those, he does include a system to handle RPI tiers:Near as I can tell this is all current and not projected stuff.
Interesting you run the AAC tourney simulator and we are by far the favorites which is not surprising. However...
Houston looks to have the 2nd best chance to reach the semis and the finals just slightly ahead of WSU. That is somewhat shocking.
Of course, since the 2000’s, out of 17 national champs, the ACC has 7 of them - hard not to be impressedYeah and Clemson jumps us. And up 6 spots. After beating UNC and squeaking by wake forest. Could you imagine the cats ever jumping six spots with a couple wins like that lol. ESPN is obsessed with the ACC
Of course, since the 2000’s, out of 17 national champs, the ACC has 7 of them - hard not to be impressed
http://www.barttorvik.com/
Just stumbled on this because of Reddit. Figured anyone here would appreciate it.
Haven't checked it out completely, but the site has a lot of really good info and almost seems like a knock off kenoom that is completely free.
***UPDATE
Seriously can't believe this site is free. It's awesome.***
Best part is when you go under an individual team, you can tinker with projections and run simulations with however many fixed outcomes of games including conference tournament. But smartly, it's incorporating rpi tiers and rpi to come up with the seeds etc.
I could play around on this thing all day
and we moved up to 2 on this site after last night.
I checked that out too...lol! That's about as high as I have seen us anywhere. It's nice to see.
Does anyone know what our RPI was before we went on our current winning streak? We are 8 now...but we may have been over 100 back then...I don't recall.
Our RPI was 128 directly after the Florida loss. Then was 42 the next week after we beat Miss St and @UCLA.