DontMissHim
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 807
Ralph--still waiting on that link about UC rejecting the Big 12 offer.
Ralph--still waiting on that link about UC rejecting the Big 12 offer.
Ralphy UC is basketball school and it has the championships plus players in the pros to back that statement up.
Wrong.
Instead of saying "we have rejected an offer from the Big 12" UC chooses to say "we are committed to the Big East". The Air Force AD stated publicly yesterday that Air Force rejected an invitation to the Big 12 in favor of joining the Big East.
UC basketball doesnt have championships and pro athletes?
Kenyon, Van exel, patterson, fortson...... alll made millions in the pros. Who from UC football has?
UC will always be a basketball school.
Instead of saying "we have rejected an offer from the Big 12" UC chooses to say "we are committed to the Big East".
In other words--you have no proof an offer was extended. Thanks...next time, try to support your argument with facts instead of pulling stuff out of the air. You wonder why no one takes you seriously?
In other words you have no proof that UC did not reject a Big 12 offer. Next time try to support your argument with facts. You wonder why no one takes you seriously?
In other words you have no proof that UC did not reject a Big 12 offer. Next time try to support your argument with facts. You wonder why no one takes you seriously?
To say UC is clearly a basketball school is insane.
UC football has won 2 league championships in the past 3 years, gone to two BCS games, had multiple peoples drafted, had 15 million dollars in donations for football specific donations.
I agree our history is with bball but I dont think you can say we are one or the other.
I would consider expanding only back to 8 if you believe the 6 you have now are solidly staying (which I still question). I am also basing this on the assumption that they don't overhaul the BCS and AQ status in 2013.
If it remains the same as it is today, they take the success of your top teams and then normalize it by the number of teams in your league. This is why the BE is so solid for maintaining AQ status. If you were to add, for instance, Air Force and Boise, the math says that is an AQ conference by a mile. If you add those 2 and 4 other schools, the math probably gets much, much worse. I'm thinking the BEST chance the BE has of remaining an AQ conf is to add only 2 teams and maximize the pull of Cincy, WV, and even Uconn who was in a BCS game last year.
How is that insane? What is the single biggest bowl game UC football has won? Papa Johns Bowl? Fort Worth Bowl? Cmonnn.
Frankly most of the Big East is made of basketball schools making it a soft football conference. UC happens to be one of them. Sure winning the Big East in football is nice, but until UC can recruit consistent elite players (which no one in the Big East can do), until UC can win a bowl game on the BCS level (which hopefully happens soon, but history shows otherwise), until UC football stays consistently relevant for 10 years, Ill call UC a basketball school all day long.
How is that insane? What is the single biggest bowl game UC football has won? Papa Johns Bowl? Fort Worth Bowl? Cmonnn.
Frankly most of the Big East is made of basketball schools making it a soft football conference. UC happens to be one of them. Sure winning the Big East in football is nice, but until UC can recruit consistent elite players (which no one in the Big East can do), until UC can win a bowl game on the BCS level (which hopefully happens soon, but history shows otherwise), until UC football stays consistently relevant for 10 years, Ill call UC a basketball school all day long.