those numbers came from KY
Well, that certainly explains why they are inaccurate. Now I understand.
those numbers came from KY
careful Patrick your going to fire him up. LOLThis post is 100% false. What did the Reds do at the trading deadline for 2 years in a row? Certainly was not picking anyone up to get them over the hump. Does Chapman closing give them a better shot at winning a championship? Have they done anything this offseason to date to make the team better? If anything to date the Reds are weaker w/o Arroyo and Choo. Oh wait their big move for the playoff run was activating Zack Duke, what a blockbuster move.
Dusty was manager of the year twice that was given some of the best young players, fielders and pitchers and Mick won as many NCAA games as Dusty won playoff games. The Reds were never close to sniffing the NLCS let alone the WS. Marvin still has not won a playoff game to date, MC is definitely better than that.
This comparison is completely horrible, let alone shows you know nothing about baseball.
now your insulting the common wealth. That's not nice.Well, that certainly explains why they are inaccurate. Now I understand.
Nobody said he was a bad coach. The question is, can he take us to the next level? It's the same question we asked about Rick Minter. Back then, we knew how to answer that question. We had a forward thinking AD and administration. By the way, how did that work out?
It's the same question with Mick. Are we happy rarely being ranked, not winning championships (league, conf. tourney, national, etc), not getting any top recruits, having a half full arena, not having passionate fans (other than the few on these Cronin fan club sites), having zero shooters, embarrassing inside game, an offense that the national announcers joke about for two hours on telecasts....probably driving away the few recruits who have a little game who are considering us,......
and then biting our finger nails on selection Sunday hoping we get selected in the tourney, and anxiously awaiting what "higher" ranked team we get to play in round 1 (because our seeds are so low).
My opinion is that he cannot take us to the next level with the type of players he keeps running out there in front of us. And, he definitely can't do it with a fanbase that despises him and won't attend games.
I understand what you are saying, but I think Mick is finally starting to get the talent that will take us there. In reality, he has only had one completely disastrous recruiting class. That is going to be expected, as sometimes you just can't catch a break. Look at our past class, a top 25 class, and next year's class, in which we already have two 4 stars and possibly another big get (Torian Graham). Bearcat NTS was spot on in his analysis of this Junior class, it was just a dud. Right now, we are stuck in a transition. Let's see how we look after next year and if there is no progress shown, then I would agree. Clearly, the recruits are starting to notice us, as we now have a solid pipeline to NYC, NJ, etc. In closing, I would like to ask you a question-Did you like Bob Huggins? If so, you are seeing pretty much the same exact stuff now as you saw with him. For most of his tenure, we had bad offense, great defense, poor shooting, and some guys who just never reach their potential. Mick is essentially trying to use the same formula, and I think it will work now that we have Darren Savino doing one hell of a job recruiting for us. He has had a tremendous impact on the program and I think we will start seeing the fruits of his work very soon.
I read a quote from B.Koch today and it went like this.
The last UC team to win and score in the 40's was a UC victory over UAB in the 1993.
Who coached that team?
So you are telling me that former HOF UC coaches had horrible offensive days?
Baloney! Pastner was handed the keys to a great team that had made it to a sweet sixteen, 2 elite eights, and a championship game in the four years before he got there. They did lose some players after Calipari left, but it was nothing compared to the train wreck that Mick was stuck with. Memphis also has nothing else to compete with, as their football team almost always sucks in recent years, they have one of the nicest arenas in the country, and they just have great facilities in general. Mick had a great tradition to work off of, and that was about it. Mick has plenty of flaws and he drives me insane sometimes, but he isn't a bad coach. You are delusional if you think he is mediocre and that we would be much better with someone else.
Told myself that I wouldn't respond to stupidity anymore, but its hard to sit on the sideline and read some of the garbage you have posted. What a surprise that after a win last night, you only have a handful of posts. All of them are some backhanded compliment. After the Xavier game, you had over 30 posts, all of them negative. Shocking, isn't it. What are the chances that you were hoping for a loss last night, just waiting by the keyboard to let us know that you again were proven right? Must have ruined your night once Rubles made that shot. Only a few idiots like yourself want Cronin fired. The beauty of it all is that he will remain coach at UC long after you are gone. And you will remain a miserable human being, just waiting in the shadows for another loss to post on an anonymous message board, letting people know how 'right' you have been all along. BTW, how's your buddy Billy Don. Both of you knew that Cronin was a bad hire from the start because of all of your 'experience'. Must have been a miserable last 3+ years for both of you.Nobody said he was a bad coach. The question is, can he take us to the next level? It's the same question we asked about Rick Minter. Back then, we knew how to answer that question. We had a forward thinking AD and administration. By the way, how did that work out?
It's the same question with Mick. Are we happy rarely being ranked, not winning championships (league, conf. tourney, national, etc), not getting any top recruits, having a half full arena, not having passionate fans (other than the few on these Cronin fan club sites), having zero shooters, embarrassing inside game, an offense that the national announcers joke about for two hours on telecasts....probably driving away the few recruits who have a little game who are considering us,......
and then biting our finger nails on selection Sunday hoping we get selected in the tourney, and anxiously awaiting what "higher" ranked team we get to play in round 1 (because our seeds are so low).
My opinion is that he cannot take us to the next level with the type of players he keeps running out there in front of us. And, he definitely can't do it with a fanbase that despises him and won't attend games.
We used to think Huggs teams were bad offense, but bad offense has now been redefined. Huggs offenses were a thing of beauty compared to what Mick throws out there. And to your comment about players not reaching their potential. Come on. You can say a lot of things about Huggs, but that's certainly not one of them. He has some of the greatest stories ever of players reaching and exceeding their potential.I understand what you are saying, but I think Mick is finally starting to get the talent that will take us there. In reality, he has only had one completely disastrous recruiting class. That is going to be expected, as sometimes you just can't catch a break. Look at our past class, a top 25 class, and next year's class, in which we already have two 4 stars and possibly another big get (Torian Graham). Bearcat NTS was spot on in his analysis of this Junior class, it was just a dud. Right now, we are stuck in a transition. Let's see how we look after next year and if there is no progress shown, then I would agree. Clearly, the recruits are starting to notice us, as we now have a solid pipeline to NYC, NJ, etc. In closing, I would like to ask you a question-Did you like Bob Huggins? If so, you are seeing pretty much the same exact stuff now as you saw with him. For most of his tenure, we had bad offense, great defense, poor shooting, and some guys who just never reach their potential. Mick is essentially trying to use the same formula, and I think it will work now that we have Darren Savino doing one hell of a job recruiting for us. He has had a tremendous impact on the program and I think we will start seeing the fruits of his work very soon.
Wow, finally got done reading this thread. I think going forward we need to tell our players they will have to read these threads if they lose the crosstown shootout, if that doesn't motivate them to play their best and win then nothing will.
I get both sides of the argument. I for one am supporting Mick and until he fully shows me he can't take this team to the next level then he will continue to have my support. This team has steadily improved every year since he's been here. Through winning then through recruiting. The rebuilding process is over. Mick did a great job at that. Now it's time to take the program to the next level of top rated teams and top seeds. I don't expect that this year as I've seen this team play. The talent isn't there. We can continue to harp on why it isn't there, but we can't change the talent mid-year. This year's recruits and next year's recruits have the talent. If they don't pan out and win at a high level then it is time to move the program in a new direction. If he continues to swing and miss on big men then it's time to move the program in a different direction. The question I want people to answer is do you think Mick gets the most out of his talent? I say absolutely. The talent isn't here and again we can and will argue why that is, but if we feel he can get the most out of his talent and the talent coming in keeps increasing then by logic we should have hope that our brighter days are still ahead for us.
1. Basketball is king in Memphis. Pastner will have 2-3 top 100 recruits from the city every year to get.
2. They play in a NBA arena in front of 16,000 fans every night.
I will say Pastner finally looks like he has a good team, they were impressive last night. You want to know why they are finally good? He has 4 senior guards. It doesn't matter how well you can recruit, it still takes upperclassmen to win in college basketball...
5 things I would like to see from Mick as a coach and in the last two recruits of this class and one in the next class (provided Lawrence doesn't leave).
1. A pure shooter (2014 class)
2. An athletic center human eraser (2014 class)
3. Another quality PG (probably 2015 class)
4. A coach to help with offensive scheme (immediately)
5. Cronin himself or another coach to work with players like Thomas who need shooting adjustments or Caupain to dribble the ball lower etc.
Within 3-4 years we need to be in high national contention or it will be time to look in another direction IMO.
5 things I would like to see from Mick as a coach and in the last two recruits of this class and one in the next class (provided Lawrence doesn't leave).
1. A pure shooter (2014 class)
2. An athletic center human eraser (2014 class)
3. Another quality PG (probably 2015 class)
4. A coach to help with offensive scheme (immediately)
5. Cronin himself or another coach to work with players like Thomas who need shooting adjustments or Caupain to dribble the ball lower etc.
Within 3-4 years we need to be in high national contention or it will be time to look in another direction IMO.
Told myself that I wouldn't respond to stupidity anymore, but its hard to sit on the sideline and read some of the garbage you have posted. What a surprise that after a win last night, you only have a handful of posts. All of them are some backhanded compliment. After the Xavier game, you had over 30 posts, all of them negative. Shocking, isn't it. What are the chances that you were hoping for a loss last night, just waiting by the keyboard to let us know that you again were proven right? Must have ruined your night once Rubles made that shot. Only a few idiots like yourself want Cronin fired. The beauty of it all is that he will remain coach at UC long after you are gone. And you will remain a miserable human being, just waiting in the shadows for another loss to post on an anonymous message board, letting people know how 'right' you have been all along. BTW, how's your buddy Billy Don. Both of you knew that Cronin was a bad hire from the start because of all of your 'experience'. Must have been a miserable last 3+ years for both of you.
And please don't act like you speak for the fan base, because you don't. I also have season tickets in the 'red sweater' section. Everyone around me is a 'true' Bearcat fan and wants the program to succeed. No one 'despises' the coach. Or cares that he went to Louisville. All they care about is that we win, do it the right way, and make the NCAA's. And in the last 3 years, that what they have been given. And it will continue into the future, much to your dismay.
L_T used to do that? Certainly not him the guy who speaks for the entire Red sweater section.I come by this site every now and then to see if I can pick up a tidbit of
info from time to time. Never bothered to register. I did feel compelled to
sign up today just so that I could applaud your post!!! The poster you are responding to used to spend his time polluting the environment at bearcat news with the same garbage. Well done!!!!!!!!!!!
Good points. I think we need more than one pure shooter though. It would be nice to have a K-Mart type eraser, but I would be happy with just a solid center with good overall skills. Some of the centers we've had recently have just been brutal. If we go 3-4 more years and don't reach your expectations, we'll be 12 years down the road at that point. Thats way too long to be out of the limelight IMO.
I would take 2 shooters as well. I think we will have a solid offensive center/PF (between Debarry, Strickland, or Moore) but I'm not sure any of them fit Cronin's scheme...maybe Moore. I know Moore is more of a PF who wants to play wing but that's not going to happen.
I'm just being realistic about the 3-4 years. He's just not going to get fired anytime soon. Not in the next two years anyway. I would advise you to deal with that reality.